#1OA Juraj Slafkovsky - Huge Disappointment

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I would wait until the end of next season(2025-26), to see where he is at. If he is in the same place, than he is not living up to expectations but he may take time to really take the next step.

I think he tops out as a 50-60 point winger, that whole draft looks like no elite talent comes of it(maybe Cooley) but so far looking like a weak draft.

...he hit 50 in his 2nd year and looks like he will this year as well in his 3rd...so he's topped out??...good call, Tips... :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh:
 
I would wait until the end of next season(2025-26), to see where he is at. If he is in the same place, than he is not living up to expectations but he may take time to really take the next step.

I think he tops out as a 50-60 point winger, that whole draft looks like no elite talent comes of it(maybe Cooley) but so far looking like a weak draft.
Hutson also has potential, same draft
 
"Just play like Brady Tkachuk" lol.

I have absolutely nothing against Juraj personally but the guy skates in wet cement. Mark Stone was a horrible skater but still carved his way into the upper echelon of the league. It's a coin toss at this point imo
 
Having a down year for sure, but still way too early to make proclamations about him as if he’s a finished product.

I do question the wisdom of that contract though.

Also… 250 posts and no one’s made a “Juraj’s still out” joke?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BigDaddyLurch
Having a down year for sure, but still way too early to make proclamations about him as if he’s a finished product.

I do question the wisdom of that contract though.

Also… 250 posts and no one’s made a “Juraj’s still out” joke?

...Habs boards have made a few in the past couple of years...they got old, apparently... :biglaugh:
 
...he hit 50 in his 2nd year and looks like he will this year as well in his 3rd...so he's topped out??...good call, Tips... :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh:

That what I think, I also thought the hot girl when I went to Vegas wanted to sleep with me but she was looking for money.

Hutson also has potential, same draft

That was a very good draft for the Habs,if played right, they can build a good team.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BigDaddyLurch
"Just play like Brady Tkachuk" lol.

I have absolutely nothing against Juraj personally but the guy skates in wet cement. Mark Stone was a horrible skater but still carved his way into the upper echelon of the league. It's a coin toss at this point imo
Juraj skates a lot better than Stone. You think Brady's skating is any better?

It took Stone 5 years after his draft to really establish himself in the NHL. In his 3rd year, he was still an AHL player, playing at roughly the same pace Juraj is playing in the NHL. Obviously not all players have the same trajectory, but I don't think it's a good comparable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane
He was incredible last night

Juraj is like 20 years old, let's wait until he's in his prime (23 or 24 years old) before passing that kind of judgement
His best game since last season. Absolutely dominated.

I don't think he'll ever be a superstar. It was a weak draft and probably the only superstar to come out of it will be Lane Hutson. But he has the potential to be a strong skilled forward. That's a dimension that teams salivate over.

He got 50 points last year and will likely get 50 this season. Not bad. A disappointment for not taking the next step but that's not uncommon for younger players. I think that contract will be money well spent when it's all over.

I think the best player from the draft will be Lane Hutson. Then it's Cooley, Wright, Salfkovsky who will be the next three in whatever order. I think it's just too soon to know how good any of these guys will be. The only true blue superstar that I see from that draft is Hutson. Others may emerge as superstars as it's very early. Cooley looks like he has a lot of potential. We'll see.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Faterson
His best game since last season. Absolutely dominated.

I don't think he'll ever be a superstar. It was a weak draft and probably the only superstar to come out of it will be Lane Hutson. But he has the potential to be a strong skilled forward. That's a dimension that teams salivate over.

He got 50 points last year and will likely get 50 this season. Not bad. A disappointment for not taking the next step but that's not uncommon for younger players. I think that contract will be money well spent when it's all over.

I think the best player from the draft will be Lane Hutson. Then it's Cooley, Wright, Salfkovsky who will be the next three in whatever order. I think it's just too soon to know how good any of these guys will be. The only true blue superstar that I see from that draft is Hutson. Others may emerge as superstars as it's very early. Cooley looks like he has a lot of potential. We'll see.
There will also likely be guys from later rounds who emerge in a few years to become stars, it happens in basically every draft. I agree with your assessment though. Slafkovsky will be a highly sought after type of player. Maybe not a superstar, maybe not even a star , but at the end of the day he will be a player 32 teams want, and will hate to match up against, especially in a series.

If the habs get a 70 pt player who his hard to contain physically that is still a great pick given how the draft was. While Cooley may be better and Wright is also breaking out, neither of those guys have put much distance from each other since draft day. It was close then and it's still close 3 almost 3 years later. You can't fault the habs for taking slafkovsky. Who knows , he could still make major leaps and end up the best of them all, it's still too early to know anything
 
He's still on pace for 40-something points this year. Disappointing out of a 1st overall in his D+3 season, but he's still only 20 years old.

How long did that Rangers first overall pick take to look good in the NHL?
 
There will also likely be guys from later rounds who emerge in a few years to become stars, it happens in basically every draft. I agree with your assessment though. Slafkovsky will be a highly sought after type of player. Maybe not a superstar, maybe not even a star , but at the end of the day he will be a player 32 teams want, and will hate to match up against, especially in a series.

If the habs get a 70 pt player who his hard to contain physically that is still a great pick given how the draft was. While Cooley may be better and Wright is also breaking out, neither of those guys have put much distance from each other since draft day. It was close then and it's still close 3 almost 3 years later. You can't fault the habs for taking slafkovsky. Who knows , he could still make major leaps and end up the best of them all, it's still too early to know anything
Shane Wright is breaking out, on pace for 49 pts. Slafkovsky is having a disappointing year, on pace for 47 pts. Perspective is everything they say...
 
This reminds me of a Norm McDonald bit about the the abbreviation I.D.

He points out that the "I" really gets a sweet deal as the I stands for "I" while the D stands for "Dentification."
In case someone is confused, ID stands for identification document
 
In case someone is confused, ID stands for identification document
roywink.gif
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad