Difficult, maybe, but certainly not impossible.Can't read behind the firewall but unless the police we called, or a player admits to it, this is going to be very difficult to prove considering this was 41 years ago.
So, it's a civil suit rather than a criminal case so we're talking about something based on balance of probabilities rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. The suit names the players, plus the team, the OHL and the CHL. The lawyer in the case says he's represented sexual assault victims "for decades" so yeah, he could have taken on a speculative case to burnish his profile, and he's quoted as being critical of hockey's "culture" as being a factor in this case.Lawyers don't like to work for free, I doubt her attorney would take on the case if he didn't believe there was enough evidence to support her claims.
Yeah, this is a high-profile case which will undoubtedly have the effect of increasing the visibility of his practice.So, it's a civil suit rather than a criminal case so we're talking about something based on balance of probabilities rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. The suit names the players, plus the team, the OHL and the CHL. The lawyer in the case says he's represented sexual assault victims "for decades" so yeah, he could have taken on a speculative case to burnish his profile, and he's quoted as being critical of hockey's "culture" as being a factor in this case.