1982 NHL Draft : The Boston Bruins draft Gord Kluzak 1st overall

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,271
14,606

Can anyone explain this to me? Why Gord Kuzlak? He was not even a great player at junior level...

Notable players drafted after Kuzlak :

Doug Gilmour, Dave Andreychuk. Phil Housley, Pat Verbeek, Brian Bellows, Scott Stevens, Tomas Sandstrom, Ray Ferraro, etc...

It isn't a strange pick at all. Kluzak was generally listed as a top 3 pick and his talent and size combination would be very enticing in any draft. As far as being a great player at the junior level, Kluzak was a post-season all star in the WHL despite significant games missed and was selected as best defenceman at the WJC as a 17 year old. Since Kluzak did that 42 years ago I believe only Doughty, second overall, and Dahlin, first overall, have been been selected as best defenceman while draft eligible.

Interesting to see how Kluzak would develop with Bourque taking on so much responsibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ESH

The Panther

Registered User
Mar 25, 2014
20,148
17,187
Tokyo, Japan
I remember Kluzak a bit with Boston in the 1988 Finals (1 assist, -5). But I didn't really see him play prior to that... and after that, he was basically done, at age 23. Such an odd and unfortunate career.

He was (is?) great friends with Oilers' career-ist Craig MacTavish, from the 1982-84 period in Boston.

The thread topic is a good one, because it does seem (to me) a bit odd that Kluzak would go 1st overall. Maybe whoever was in charge of the pick (Sinden?) liked Western Hockey League guys or something, I don't know. Was Kluzak typically 'ranked' higher as a prospect than Scott Stevens, who was in the OHL and had had a fine season (playing with Bellows) and winning the Memorial Cup?

Nothing wrong with grabbing a big, good skating, two-way Dman with your first pick, but... I think it's a matter of playing the odds. Like, if your pick ends up being Scott Stevens or Chris Pronger, you kind of win the lottery. But I think it's pretty rare that a defensively reponsible Dman at 18 can be guessed to be such an impact player at the NHL level that it's worth the gamble of taking him over elite scoring forwards (who may influence games less, but at least you kind of know what you're getting). The Bruins had already won the lottery once by getting Bourque three years earlier, so maybe they thought they'd roll the dice again.

What we saw of Kluzak doesn't indicate that he was a 'deserved' 1st overall pick, but it's hard to say when it's a Dman who was basically done at 23. You'd have to see a few more years to start to judge it.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,066
92,978
Vancouver, BC
I remember Kluzak a bit with Boston in the 1988 Finals (1 assist, -5). But I didn't really see him play prior to that... and after that, he was basically done, at age 23. Such an odd and unfortunate career.

He was (is?) great friends with Oilers' career-ist Craig MacTavish, from the 1982-84 period in Boston.

The thread topic is a good one, because it does seem (to me) a bit odd that Kluzak would go 1st overall. Maybe whoever was in charge of the pick (Sinden?) liked Western Hockey League guys or something, I don't know. Was Kluzak typically 'ranked' higher as a prospect than Scott Stevens, who was in the OHL and had had a fine season (playing with Bellows) and winning the Memorial Cup?

Nothing wrong with grabbing a big, good skating, two-way Dman with your first pick, but... I think it's a matter of playing the odds. Like, if your pick ends up being Scott Stevens or Chris Pronger, you kind of win the lottery. But I think it's pretty rare that a defensively reponsible Dman at 18 can be guessed to be such an impact player at the NHL level that it's worth the gamble of taking him over elite scoring forwards (who may influence games less, but at least you kind of know what you're getting). The Bruins had already won the lottery once by getting Bourque three years earlier, so maybe they thought they'd roll the dice again.

What we saw of Kluzak doesn't indicate that he was a 'deserved' 1st overall pick, but it's hard to say when it's a Dman who was basically done at 23. You'd have to see a few more years to start to judge it.

Kluzak was named the top defender at the 1982 WJCs as a 17 year old and was named a 2nd Team WHL All-Star despite missing half the season. He was bigger than Stevens and put up better offensive numbers than Stevens in their draft year, and considered a better prospect at the time.

And again, he was probably 'really' the #2 overall pick that year after being rated #3 by the Hockey News heading into the draft. Nothing too crazy there.
 

vadim sharifijanov

Registered User
Oct 10, 2007
29,799
18,018
maybe the real question of this thread is what happened with gary nylund?

i found an article leading uo to the draft suggesting that boston was considering passing up bellows at #1 for nylund, not kluzak.

a big dman who was drafted over stevens and housley, but only lasted eight real years and to my understanding never was anything resembling a star in the NHL. one of many young players rushed and ruined by the 80s leafs, or just not nearly as good as he looked in junior? he also was on that 1982 gold medal WJC team, though he didn’t make the all-star team like kluzak, WHL first team all-star and made the memorial cup all-star team going into the draft.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,066
92,978
Vancouver, BC
maybe the real question of this thread is what happened with gary nylund?

i found an article leading uo to the draft suggesting that boston was considering passing up bellows at #1 for nylund, not kluzak.

a big dman who was drafted over stevens and housley, but only lasted eight real years and to my understanding never was anything resembling a star in the NHL. one of many young players rushed and ruined by the 80s leafs, or just not nearly as good as he looked in junior? he also was on that 1982 gold medal WJC team, though he didn’t make the all-star team like kluzak, WHL first team all-star and made the memorial cup all-star team going into the draft.

From hockeydraftcentral.com :

Injury-Plagued Rookie Year: Although Nylund's luck in the NHL wasn't quite as bad as that of 1982 No. 1 pick Gord Kluzak, it wasn't much better. Like Kluzak, Nylund would spend much of his early NHL career out of the lineup with injuries. Unlike Kluzak, however, Nylund had never suffered a major injury prior to entering the NHL. The trouble began right away, as he missed the start of the 1982-83 season with a torn ACL in his left knee, an injury suffered when he was checked by Wilf Paiement in the offensive zone during Toronto's Sept. 27, 1982, preseason game vs. Quebec. The injury required surgery on Oct. 6, 1982, and Nylund returned home to British Columbia, to recuperate from the surgery and begin his rehabilitation. Three months later, in January 1983, Nylund was ready to skate again. Because Nylund still had major-junior eligibility remaining, he could not be sent to the minor leagues for an injury rehab stint before entering the NHL. Toronto wanted him to have pro experience rather than return him to junior, so he suffered through the injury-plagued rookie season while on the Maple Leafs roster. Wearing a special knee brace, he finally made his NHL debut on Feb. 6, 1983, and would play only 16 games for Toronto in the 1982-83 season. His brief season ended with another tear of the ACL in his left knee. He suffered the injury during Toronto's March 12, 1983, game vs. Chicago. The injury required surgery, and he did not begin his 1983-84 season until Toronto's Dec. 23, 1983, game at Detroit. He scored a goal in that first game back, played all of the remaining 47 games that season and had no other major problems with his left knee for the remainder of his career. He did, however, later suffer injuries to his right knee. Ironically, it was a final injury to his right knee, suffered during the 1992-93 season, that ended his career.

Pretty much the same deal as Kluzak. He somehow tore his left ACL *TWICE* within 8 months of being drafted. Later blew out his right knee and retired at age 29.

Even today a return after ACL surgery is close to a year so the fact that he did his ACL and had surgery in September and then returned in February seems incredibly suspect.

Also, as you say, going to Toronto at that point was not a good thing for a young defender.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad