15th Overall, Michael Brandsegg-Nygaard

Not bad for a 3rd line grinder



He looks like he could already be a solid 30 point player on the 3rd line.

I still think his range of outcomes is somewhere between Lawson Crouse and Timo Meier. 40-60 points, bang the other team up in the corners and keeps his end clean.

Looking at the rest of the 2024 draft class in hindsight there’s only one player I waffle on as a better choice than MBN, and that’s Hage. I felt that way on draft day and think both players are great and will be solid NHLers. The question is how do you want to play as a team down the line, and I think we can say that even if MBN doesn’t have as much raw talent as Hage (who I think could be a Kyrou level talent) MBN makes the team harder to play against.

Don’t @ me with any Eiserman trash. That kid was a spare part on a gold medal winning team and got most of his points in blowouts against the lowest level teams in that tournament.
 
He looks like he could already be a solid 30 point player on the 3rd line.

I still think his range of outcomes is somewhere between Lawson Crouse and Timo Meier. 40-60 points, bang the other team up in the corners and keeps his end clean.

Looking at the rest of the 2024 draft class in hindsight there’s only one player I waffle on as a better choice than MBN, and that’s Hage. I felt that way on draft day and think both players are great and will be solid NHLers. The question is how do you want to play as a team down the line, and I think we can say that even if MBN doesn’t have as much raw talent as Hage (who I think could be a Kyrou level talent) MBN makes the team harder to play against.

Don’t @ me with any Eiserman trash. That kid was a spare part on a gold medal winning team and got most of his points in blowouts against the lowest level teams in that tournament.
your hate for eiserman is amusing
 
He looks like he could already be a solid 30 point player on the 3rd line.

I still think his range of outcomes is somewhere between Lawson Crouse and Timo Meier. 40-60 points, bang the other team up in the corners and keeps his end clean.

Looking at the rest of the 2024 draft class in hindsight there’s only one player I waffle on as a better choice than MBN, and that’s Hage. I felt that way on draft day and think both players are great and will be solid NHLers. The question is how do you want to play as a team down the line, and I think we can say that even if MBN doesn’t have as much raw talent as Hage (who I think could be a Kyrou level talent) MBN makes the team harder to play against.

Don’t @ me with any Eiserman trash. That kid was a spare part on a gold medal winning team and got most of his points in blowouts against the lowest level teams in that tournament.
I agree that his best outcome being more rangy than some want to admit. His skillset is intriguing because he seems to fall maybe closer to the skill level of a Meier than a Crouse. Teams need MBNs in the top 6, especially us. I'm done with us getting bullied around

Eiserman, and even Hage, are going to have a lot harder time putting up points at the NHL level than some want to admit. Even if Hage is a potential Kyrou, I think, dare I say, the intangibles will prove to be extra gravy for us than what a Kyrou brings (I'm actually lower on him than most)

Not to mention, MBN raised his level of play during the WHC for Norway last year and once again in the SHL this year. I value players that can elevate when the game gets tighter. Takes the load off your star players. Sam Bennett has been great for us
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winger98

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad