I agree pyatt should be gone but Miller you can tell isnt quite ready yet. id rather him get big minutes right nowHmm.
Kreider--Stepan--Zuccarello
Pouliot--Richards--Callahan
Hagelin--Brassard--Pyatt
Mashinter--Boyle--Dorsett
???
Pyatt......You need to tell me, Miller can't play on the 3rd line with Hagelin/Brassard?
![]()
First must win game of the season is tonight...
I wouldn't hate Pyatt in the lineup so ****ing much if he would just stop with the offensive zone penalties that are totally unprovoked. Those and how slow he is. Dear lord. AV wants a speed game but why the **** is the slowest skater on the team still in????
First must win game of the season is tonight...
Small sample size, but if there is a stat like that (and it's significant), then you'll be more than likely right, unless it's some sort of statistical anomaly.
gotta play him to waive or trade himwhy did Sather even sign this guy??
Last season, teams won on 41 out of 85 opportunities to extend a 3 game winning streak to 4 games. We can call it about half. For me that reinforces my original thought, which is that I'm not raising my expectations for this game.
First must win game of the season is tonight...
This.
Girlfriend just bought me this awesome totally authentic Callahan jersey. Can't wait to wear it, especially considering he came off the IR much sooner than expected. What a warrior.
I hate NBC games. No GCL![]()
And we have to listen to doc.
If you had hockey streams that wouldn't be a problem
This sort of thing gets tricky with a team sport, though. Because player and team performance can actually be affected by things such as perception of current events, we're not talking about a situation akin to playing roulette. These are human beings playing a competitive sport where game & external events actually affect performance, and can affect their likelihood of winning.I know about the gambler's fallacy. It's actually somewhat based on reality, but people don't understand it. If you play the roulette 10 takes, then winning one time in 10 tries is more likely than winning it if you play it only one time, on the first try. However, if you lost 9 times in a row, your chances don't go up on the 10th time (nor go down).
Except that's not what you said.Last season, teams won on 41 out of 85 opportunities to extend a 3 game winning streak to 4 games. We can call it about half. For me that reinforces my original thought, which is that I'm not raising my expectations for this game.
Well, realistically in today's NHL, no matter who the competition is, I always expect to lose after winning 3 in a row.
Last season, teams won on 41 out of 85 opportunities to extend a 3 game winning streak to 4 games. We can call it about half. For me that reinforces my original thought, which is that I'm not raising my expectations for this game.
This sort of thing gets tricky with a team sport, though. Because player and team performance can actually be affected by things such as perception of current events, we're not talking about a situation akin to playing roulette. These are human beings playing a competitive sport where game & external events actually affect performance, and can affect their likelihood of winning.
I don't think skill-based competitive team sports find a comparable in a purely random game like, say, craps or roulette.
I must be one of the few, but I enjoy the NBC crew. I think Doc and Pierre do a great job. I enjoy the extra tidbits of information they give. Even though Pierre is sometimes a little creepy.
+1. I love Doc and I don't understand why everyone hates Pierre? They are both really passionate and loves the game which makes it a lot more fun to watch.