When you're leaning on sub-23 year olds to provide a bulk of offense like we're doing, this is what happens.
Which is why I sarcastically suggested coming back in 2-3 years when the team has some experience and can find the net. We were rookie heavy before Stamkos, Malone, and Hedman went down and now we have, like, 3 lines of rookies hitting posts and shooting wide and our vets can't make up the difference. If we don't make a trade, which I understand the reasons against, there is no reason to expect a change in how we're playing. Nothing in the past 10 games suggests we're just snake-bitten or underperforming. I'd say the opposite. The first games after Stamkos went down were the anomaly.
But when I (or others) suggest this means we're going to drop in the standings,
precisely because of the above, we're stupid ****s who don't watch the team or know hockey, etc. etc.
I truly hope you're right and everything will come up roses. Glad we didn't shut out again tonight, because I'm over that ****. I'm going back to my bourbon.