Terry Yake
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2013
- 28,114
- 16,748
surprised sprong didn't get a hat trickMulti points nights for Heinen and Sherwood. Wooof
this team is pathetic, and it starts at the top. the samuelis don't care about winning
surprised sprong didn't get a hat trickMulti points nights for Heinen and Sherwood. Wooof
We're about two coaches and one more failed GM away from that point.I wonder at what point Sabres fans were resigned to just not being good ever again, because I'm starting to inch there ever so slowly
i would say i did it just for fun, then i realized i would be lying.I didn’t even bother watching the 3rd. I had seen enough.
Baby’s not walking yet.Will be interesting to see whether they can apply some of that sustained pressure from last game against a non-terrible team. I won’t ask for converting chances or anything outlandish like that. Just, execute a system against a team that isn’t as pathetic as we are. Baby step 1.
Other than new or improving young players, the Ducks essentially swapped Lyubshkin and Henrique for Dumoulin and Fabbri. While I like both players, it's essentially treading water. The team is essentially the same.
I've been pretty unimpressed by Zellweger, LaCombe and Luneau so far.
The other teams don't even look like they're trying. It's just like the most casual NHL game/scrimmage. Making their after game dinner plans as they stroll to a 5-1 win.This really is unwatchable hockey. I can handle boring hockey if the team is clearly competitive and executing on a viable plan. I can handle bad hockey if the team is playing in an exciting way that shows they have skill and potential but just aren't there yet.
But please don't give me both.
It comes into sharper focus when you watch the games on the opponent’s broadcast. They’re just so excited to be firing on all cylinders, entering the zone at will, there’s a sense of inevitability that they’ll win.The other teams don't even look like they're trying. It's just like the most casual NHL game/scrimmage. Making their after game dinner plans as they stroll to a 5-1 win.
Adding vets who would help turn the corner is going to have to be via trade. You could do what chi did and add the likes of Hall, TT, Bertuzzi, but they are at this point more secondary guys. Going to have to give to get.It's too many support players. The Ducks have a lot of solid players who would be successful in other situations. The vets they have are not on-ice leaders but off-ice leaders. They need players who can pull them back in and settle games down. The Ducks don't have those players and PV tried/failed in obtaining them.
It's a failure of the GM to properly add to his team, failure of the coach to properly use the players he has been given, and failure of the players (especially the vets) for not showing a consistent effort every night. When a team is failing at all 3 levels, it's a recipe the creates the Anaheim Ducks.