Magua
Entirely Palatable Product
My favorite Shakespeare play is Cats.
I mean I get it, but no one in 10th grade wants to read a Shakespare book, well maybe not everyone, but I'd say the number of those wanted to is a lot smaller than those not wanting to.
That's one way to look at it that I didn't think about and it makes total sense.Yep. Almost assuredly true.
I'm not exactly happy looking back with what they taught us in high school, but honestly I wish they pushed us more outside of our comfort zones. It's the only way to find what you like.
Hit job on cats!
Soft Tissue Infection of Immunocompetent Man with Cat-Derived <em>Globicatella</em> Species
Soft Tissue Infection of Immunocompetent Man with Cat-Derived <em>Globicatella</em> Specieswwwnc.cdc.gov
Thing is that it's an academic abstract not a sensationalized article....no offense taken. Bottom line was that the individual got a previously unknown cat bite infection that barely responded to antibiotics. Stuff like this is becoming more prevalent. Microrganisms are starting to outpace our antibiotics.No offense, but I lost interest about halfway through reading the article title.
Too many words, color coordinate the large swath I will take.Being the generous ruler that i am. I have decide to offer Executive Committee Range to the general public
I mean I get it, but no one in 10th grade wants to read a Shakespare book, well maybe not everyone, but I'd say the number of those wanted to is a lot smaller than those not wanting to.
Thing is that it's an academic abstract not a sensationalized article....no offense taken. Bottom line was that the individual got a previously unknown cat bite infection that barely responded to antibiotics. Stuff like this is becoming more prevalent. Microrganisms are starting to outpace our antibiotics.
We got Romeo and Juliet freshman year, then the next two I believe went Macbeth and Hamlet. Since I was in honors and the local theater group was performing As You Like It junior year we got that one added in. Just reading, not acting. Senior year (AP English) I don't think we did any Shakespeare, which really sucked because I hated and skipped reading most of the books we were assigned. I think our teacher had a sailor fetish because we got two books about them.In the UK (well, almost 20 years ago) our first introduction in school to Shakespeare (aside from little bits and pieces at maybe age ~7-8) was through drama lessons.
So doing excerpts from specific plays (Hamlet in our case) from the slightly more modernised play text and not the original itself. That was at age ~12-13 I would say.
Which is far more engaging and makes people appreciate the context more. Plus for 90% of kids f***ing around pretending to act/overacting is quite fun, especially with no audience apart from your peers.
Then at ~14-16 we had Romeo and Juliet as part of the curriculum in a more standard way. But after the dalliance in drama with Shakespeare I think more people appreciated it/could read it easily etc.
Tbh though I always think that for highschool kids? They just choose the wrong plays to introduce people to his work aha. Start with A Midsummer Night's Dream... it is basically perfect material for idiot teenagers who like f***ing around.
I despise Jane Eyre. I never want to see anything about Jane Eyre again. Or Wuthering Heights. AWFUL PIECES OF LITERATURE.
Yep. Almost assuredly true.
I'm not exactly happy looking back with what they taught us in high school, but honestly I wish they pushed us more outside of our comfort zones. It's the only way to find what you like.
I had a Shakespeare class in college, along with covering his work in other classes (English/Film major). The textbook was the Penguin edition, and the words on the page were dry. No context, no stage direction, no intonation - just words on a page. This was the 1980s, and VHS was still a relatively new medium, so when our library was upgraded to include a video media room and individual viewing carrels the previous semester, they also stocked up on PBS versions of Shakespeare adaptations (Taming of the Shrew with John Cleese as Petruchio!).
Having the semester's syllabus on hand, I noticed every one of the plays had a corresponding VHS tape in the library, so instead of reading The Bard's work, I could simply watch it. Made ALL the difference in the world. I was acing the quizzes and exams left and right. I told some fellow students about it and we would gather in the media room to watch Henry V, The Tempest, A Midsummer's Night Dream, etc.
Eventually, some jealous knucklehead decided to rat on me to the professor while we were in class. I simply replied it helped with understanding material over 350 years old in the context in which it was intended/interpreted. Starting that week, the professor organized class viewings in the media room. I rocked an A for the course, and I don't think I would have done as well if I stuck to the textbook.
My final paper was titled, "The Propaganda of Comedy in Henry V," which received an A+ and high praise from the professor. The next semester, I had a course in Great English Writers II, where the professor was a thoroughly negative wonk. I submitted the exact same paper (we covered Henry V in that class, too) and received a B-.
Yes, but the difference is that it was a completely novel pathogen apparently if you want to be a nerd and read the abstract...Cat bites have always been very dangerous and antibiotic-resistant. If a cat bite breaks your skin, you need treatment.
It was 9th 10th grade when I read several of his books. I think Othello was the only one that held my interest. But then again, here I am decades later, referencing one play and quoting another.I mean I get it, but no one in 10th grade wants to read a Shakespare book, well maybe not everyone, but I'd say the number of those wanted to is a lot smaller than those not wanting to.
It was 9th 10th grade when I read several of his books. I think Othello was the only one that held my interest. But then again, here I am decades later, referencing one play and quoting another.