OT: 110th Obsequious Banter Thread: Giving 110% and more

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

What is the maximum effort?


  • Total voters
    18
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
If it's food and booze it isn't wasted, unless the food is broccoli, tomatoes, chicken salad, eggs, pancakes, and pears.

Allow me to add mushrooms, peppers, all spicy things, lima beans, avocado, yogurt, sweet potatoes, sparkling water, and pumpkin spice things.

For the record, I love all the above things you mentioned.
 
Anyone here a regular road cyclist?

Looking for a new bike and it is just zero fun because of my dimensions...

79cm inseam at 180cm tall... so yeh...
my torso really calls for a 56 but my legs? I can maybe get away with a 54 (usually ride a 53-54) but it is a small squeeze and no fun to get on and off anywhere but on flat aha without potentially bruised testicles... but a 52 generally leaves me cramped even with saddle back, bars forward.

Without a custom frame, anyone have similar dimensions and know bike companies that run longer top-tubes vs stem with a slightly lower bar-height to get a good position? I have heard Willier kind of do, some Giant as well... but opinions online in forums all over the place really. Asked a lot of friends who work in cycling and as my measurements are to the extreme (basically a 6'2 torso with 5'7 legs or so aha!) they are mostly stumped. I am quite "ankley" though... so my saddle height I can get away with about 71 at least, which helps slightly.

And asking HFboards about all kinds of topics usually works to some degree. Ofc I could just go to a high end shop and try 50 different bikes aha... but CBA with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wankstifier
The low six figures aint going to do shit for you nowadays. If you want to retire by 50, you need to probably make at least 300k a year
Which, I would guess is like between top 10 - 5% of household incomes. I read like 25% is considered "upper middle class", and I was seeing numbers like 150k for that threshold.

I really think that's pretty inaccurate....or I'm actually just poor.
 
Anyone here a regular road cyclist?

Looking for a new bike and it is just zero fun because of my dimensions...

79cm inseam at 180cm tall... so yeh...
my torso really calls for a 56 but my legs? I can maybe get away with a 54 (usually ride a 53-54) but it is a small squeeze and no fun to get on and off anywhere but on flat aha without potentially bruised testicles... but a 52 generally leaves me cramped even with saddle back, bars forward.

Without a custom frame, anyone have similar dimensions and know bike companies that run longer top-tubes vs stem with a slightly lower bar-height to get a good position? I have heard Willier kind of do, some Giant as well... but opinions online in forums all over the place really. Asked a lot of friends who work in cycling and as my measurements are to the extreme (basically a 6'2 torso with 5'7 legs or so aha!) they are mostly stumped. I am quite "ankley" though... so my saddle height I can get away with about 71 at least, which helps slightly.

And asking HFboards about all kinds of topics usually works to some degree. Ofc I could just go to a high end shop and try 50 different bikes aha... but CBA with that.

Well, I'm kind of the other body type- longish legs for my hight. I have a Wilier Cento1 Air and it fits me beautifully. I don't remember the dimensions offhand. You can always "stretch" the top with a longer stem and increasing the setback of the saddle (some seat posts have the saddle mounting bracket set back more than others). I also have an older (2002) Look carbon frame and that has a somewhat longer top tube. It was a little too stretched out for me so I got a shorter stem, which worked.

But a good bike shop can use a fit kit to give you recommendations for frame geometry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Appleyard
Which, I would guess is like between top 10 - 5% of household incomes. I read like 25% is considered "upper middle class", and I was seeing numbers like 150k for that threshold.

I really think that's pretty inaccurate....or I'm actually just poor.
I'd say that those numbers are probably pretty inaccurate, or haven't been updated in quite a few years
 
Well, I'm kind of the other body type- longish legs for my hight. I have a Wilier Cento1 Air and it fits me beautifully. I don't remember the dimensions offhand. You can always "stretch" the top with a longer stem and increasing the setback of the saddle (some seat posts have the saddle mounting bracket set back more than others). I also have an older (2002) Look carbon frame and that has a somewhat longer top tube. It was a little too stretched out for me so I got a shorter stem, which worked.

But a good bike shop can use a fit kit to give you recommendations for frame geometry.

Yeh, even setting back saddle and having as long a stem as possible and having handlebars forward on a 52 is still cramped though... which is really what I should ride I guess for my legs. As hard to make up that much of a difference without drastically altering weight balance.

to make things worse my span is 183cm.

Just wish there was a 52 with a ~56 top bar aha. Without paying thousands for a custom frame.

Will have a look at some of the Look frames then.

I used to work for Cycling UK and most people there were even at a loss sans custom frame. Just such an abnormal gap. Great for swimming but not so good for Cycling aha.

If I was actually racing or doing regular long rides where never had to stop at weekend and could afford ~3 bikes or something... I would not worry at all about my standover height and probably ride a 54 or even 56 on longer rides and have my saddle at probably 71-72 as I have ran that and does not feel cramped even though could have a bit more length, but yeh... a 54 can be a slight nuisance when have to stop start and a 56, well, if have to stop have to basically jump off lmao.

I ride shorter crank arms and that helps a bit...
 
Yeh, even setting back saddle and having as long a stem as possible and having handlebars forward on a 52 is still cramped though... which is really what I should ride I guess for my legs. As hard to make up that much of a difference without drastically altering weight balance.

to make things worse my span is 183cm.

Just wish there was a 52 with a ~56 top bar aha. Without paying thousands for a custom frame.

Will have a look at some of the Look frames then.

I used to work for Cycling UK and most people there were even at a loss sans custom frame. Just such an abnormal gap. Great for swimming but not so good for Cycling aha.

If I was actually racing or doing regular long rides where never had to stop at weekend and could afford ~3 bikes or something... I would not worry at all about my standover height and probably ride a 54 or even 56 on longer rides and have my saddle at probably 71-72 as I have ran that and does not feel cramped even though could have a bit more length, but yeh... a 54 can be a slight nuisance when have to stop start and a 56, well, if have to stop have to basically jump off lmao.

I ride shorter crank arms and that helps a bit...
Well, you could always go for a Wahoo Kickr smart bike. I have one and it's awesome. Of course you can't ride it outdoors... :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Appleyard
  • Like
Reactions: achdumeingute
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Please disable your adblocker on HFBoards.com

It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Support us by allowing our site to function as we intended. Please disable your adblocker and add us to your allowlist.

Frequently Asked Questions
I'm not using a blocker. Why am I seeing this message?
You're likely seeing this message because an app or extension on your computer is blocking ads. The app or extension may be a "privacy" or "malware" blocker, or a VPN.

I disabled my blocker. Why am I still seeing this message?
It's common to have two or more adblocking extensions running at the same time. See the question above.