GDT: 11/3 GAME #10 - BRUINS at Tampa Bay | NESN, WBZ-FM 98.5

[Fossy21]

Even more lucky, that was at or just above the crossbar. Still inconclusive, sadly.

 

[CharasLazyWrister]

LOL you guys are funny.

It's clearly not conclusive. It's a good goal.

The blatant bias is rather comedic, though.

 

[TP]

pushing our luck with these reviews

 

[LouJersey]

That's no goAl

 

[Pia8988]

Those never get overturned. That was high though.

 

[mark3361]

Reviews suck...these slowdowns in the game ruin it

 

[Jorah Marshmont]

All those missed chances are looming large now

 

[Jean_Jacket41]

Can't win all the reviews...

No let's get back that game.

 

[ashnathan]

Was too close, id hate that to be taken away if it were a bruin stick too. Time for big boy hockey, take the lead back and close it out dont get your heads down

 

[missingchicklet]

Wow. I know Johnson is short, but he'd have to be a midget for that to be under the bar based on where his stick made contact with the puck in relation to his body.

 

[Jean_Jacket41]

Good follow-up shifts and doing everything but score.

 

[Fossy21]

If the refs saw it from the angle of that camera, they'd probably call it a no-goal on the ice, then it being inconclusive would've benefitted us. Oh well.

 

[LouJersey]

LOL you guys are funny.

It's clearly not conclusive. It's a good goal.

The blatant bias is rather comedic, though.

Yeah God forbid fans want a call to go their teams way. You would think you were on a Bruins board or something.

 

[Emerz]

whos ready for hayes to snipe bar down for the win

 

[SanDogBrewin]

Keep pushing Bs.

 

[Bruinaura]

Eeek Quaider

 

[JCRO]

Wow. I know Johnson is short, but he'd have to be a midget for that to be under the bar based on where his stick made contact with the puck in relation to his body.

Hit stick was above Krugs shoulders in height when he deflected the puck. . I think Krugs shoulders are taller than the net, as short as he is... no goal. BS

 

[Oates2Neely]

Most likely not a good goal (over crossbar). Original call was goal, I didn't see any conclusive evidence to overturn it

 

[TMac21]

Let's go Bs, take points out of this one.

 

[pierre gagnon*]

that was almost a goal again grenade stick handling dee

 

[CharasLazyWrister]

Yeah God forbid fans want a call to go their teams way. You would think you were on a Bruins board or something.

It's not about "wanting" a call to go their way. That would be "I hope this goes our way".

It's about blatant bias. I would have thrown down my life savings on the goal being disallowed because it was inconclusive. It's not difficult to figure out when you're not constantly watching with the attitude of your favorite team being the victim.

 

[Jean_Jacket41]

Let's win this.

Who wants to be the hero?

 

[JCRO]

LOL you guys are funny.

It's clearly not conclusive. It's a good goal.

The blatant bias is rather comedic, though.

Its ok for the refs to be wrong. They're only human.

 

[SanDogBrewin]

Wow. I know Johnson is short, but he'd have to be a midget for that to be under the bar based on where his stick made contact with the puck in relation to his body.

Stick was above the bar.

 

[TP]

Holy Carlo!!!