GDT: #11 - 10/28/18 | RANGERS @ kings | 3:30 - MSG

[member 116805]

only for offsides

Aha, thanks

 

[Nickmo82]

Don't sound so pleased Ref!

I wonder how long before a make up call for LA?

 

[Rempe73]

Zib’s passing is frustrating me

 

[duhmetreE]

You watched the play 20 times during the initial review... HOW DO YOU THINK THAT WAS GOALIE INTERFERENCE

 

[Kakko]

I'm still not sure what happened. Did they challenge the result of our challenge? Why wouldn't the original review have figured this out?

 

[Vinny DeAngelo]

Slick pass by buch to set up that goal..

 

[NoQuitInNewMexico]

Coach only loses a pretty worthless timeout on that, gives him a small chance to turn the momentum against a low-scoring team. Not his fault for gaming the rules.

 

[NewLife]

But you get a delay of game minor for wrongly challange an offside............

 

[Ori]

A good shift by the Zib line, LA iceing!

 

[smoneil]

The only person that sounds like they're putting to much on him is you.....

He has not failed to live up to expectations. The only way he has failed is if your expectations for him are beyond reasonable. He's 19, he will be fine. But he surely shouldn't be expected to produce at a 1st or 2nd line player this year. But playing with McLeod does absolutely nothing for his development.

There is literally no way to interpret anything that I wrote as me "putting too much on him." It is absurd.

I explained why I said I could see the logic. It's about player psychology and how to develop young players. I've coached kids for years and understand that the block is sometimes in a guy's head rather than in their skill/pedigree. If it were always as simple as "play him with top guys until he figures it out" then that's what everyone would do.

 

[Tob]

1st of the season for the 1st of the game on game 11 at 11:11. C'mon down Jack Hughes.

 

[duhmetreE]

Chytil with ONE minute of ice time.

 

[Rempe73]

I wasn’t paying attention. Who was Joe talking about when he said “he allowed Namestnikov space to score” or something like that?

 

[EpicDing]

I'm still not sure what happened. Did they challenge the result of our challenge? Why wouldn't the original review have figured this out?

Original review was initiated by Toronto I think. LA is just dumb for challenging.

 

[Tob]

I'm still not sure what happened. Did they challenge the result of our challenge? Why wouldn't the original review have figured this out?

We didn't challenge. The league initiated the review on the play and determined the puck was in before the contact. Then LA challenged interference.

 

[Nickmo82]

I'm still not sure what happened. Did they challenge the result of our challenge? Why wouldn't the original review have figured this out?

I'm pretty sure that Toronto overruled the ref's original no goal decision, not the Rangers. So LA basically asked Toronto to check on Toronto's decision.

 

[Harbour Dog]

Brown

That needs to be giffed

 

[Vinny DeAngelo]

I didn’t think in zone possession could be that ugly

 

[duhmetreE]

I didn’t think in zone possession could be that ugly

I hate that Hayes tries an extreme low percentage play with that type of possession

 

[aufheben]

Namestnikov just won like 10,000 Quinn Bucks for that goal

 

[effen]

Spooner is the least shifty 5'10" 180 puck skills guy I've ever seen

beyond worthless.

 

[Tob]

Chytil with ONE minute of ice time.

#FireQuinn

 

[I Eat Crow]

Chytil with ONE minute of ice time.

Just send him down to Hartford and call Fogarty up.

 

[I Eat Crow]

Namestnikov just won like 10,000 Quinn Bucks for that goal

What is the exchange rate between Quinn Bucks and Stanley Nickels?

 

[Tob]

Namestnikov just won like 10,000 Quinn Bucks for that goal

what is the conversion rate on Quinn Bucks?