Sometimes you have to give credit where it's due. Panarin goes in on a breakaway in the 3rd period and Varlamov shuts him down. A couple minutes later here's Zibanejad and again Varlamov shuts him down. It could have been the other way.
So the positives I take from this---the Rangers have taken a significant step forward this year in the realm of defending. We don't often see big shot numbers against our goalies anymore. I thought the Howden, DiGiuseppe, Lafreniere line had some great shifts and it's probably (for me anyway) the best game that Julien Gauthier's played for us. As I said overall team defense has improved significantly.
This was anybody's game really until late.
Agreed on all counts.
3 things directly led to the loss. 1) Varlamov decided to be Patrick Roy for a night. Yeah, he was that good. 2) Hajek's blind, backhanded up the middle pass. Pretty sure that is not what Martin preaches. And on the last goal, overpassing on the perimeter led to a give away. The Isled come down and score.
One of the things in the differences between the two teams was obvious. The Isles get the puck to the net first and then worry about it later. The Rangers worry about getting the shot first and all else comes later. That needs to change. You can also see it when the Rangers try to generate the offense off the rush instead of getting the puck in deep.
Have to love the structure for most of the night (aside from the Isles second goal and Hajek's mindless giveaway). Honestly, at least at this part of the season, I would expect the youngest team in the league that is playing a veteran, defense first lockdown team to have such results. As the learn and grow more, the results will change as well. But this was hardly unexpected.
Gauthier had his most memorable game for the Rangers. He is still, at least to me, the first to come out when Blackwell returns.
Finally, like it or not my fellow Rangers fans, the PP looked A LOT better with DeAngelo running it. Not to disparage Fox, but he is not as dynamic offensively DeAngelo is. DeAngelo would shoot from the point. Fox does not really do that. He does utilize his wrister to get the shot on goal, but more often than not, he is passing the puck whereas DeAngelo would do both. Also, with DeAngelo running the PP, he seemingly retrieved all pucks before they left the zone. The puck never seemed to leave the zone as he was darting around everywhere. Nothing that can be done now. Just an observation. At this point, they would be much better off getting the puck deep and then outnumbering the opposition's players down low.