Like many players, Ericsson had a peak where he was better than how his career is often described in general. He was a legit 2nd-pair type for a minute there, I daresay for a couple seasons. But like you touch on, he is remembered far more for the time he was over-deployed and struggled than he is for the time he was at his peak.Eriksson was a legit NHLer. His biggest problem was playing as a 2/3 guy when he was way better as a bottom pair guy.
Sorry, I was just commenting on Big Rig's skating. I don't remember him seeing the world on fire with his mobility especially with his hip issues. I appreciated what he brought to the team, though. He played his role well.
lol u seemed to be the one getting heated.Jeez, he played 700 NHL games, was forced to play beyond his capabilities in Detroit and represented a top 5 country in several international tournaments. For the record he won bronze in the 2010 WCs and silver in the 2014 Olympics.
I'm guessing he p****d in your Cheerios with how upset you are about his career, it must have been pretty traumatic.
By the end of his career, yes. Not at his peak though.lol u seemed to be the one getting heated.
I just dont like the revision of his playing career. He was a glorified practice cone.
He was unlucky with injuries but at a certain put that's what your career becomes. We dont live in a hypothetical of what could have been.His biggest problem was hip injuries later in the career, so everybody remembers only the bad things and bad era as a whipping boy.
He was a black Ace at 2008 playoffs.
He was very good in 2009 playoff run, but outside of that run he was very leaky and seemed to have a low panic threshold.By the end of his career, yes. Not at his peak though.
Don't get it twisted: I'm using facts, you are using hyperbole.lol u seemed to be the one getting heated.
I just dont like the revision of his playing career. He was a glorified practice cone.
He was unlucky with injuries but at a certain put that's what your career becomes. We dont live in a hypothetical of what could have been.
He was very good in 2009 playoff run, but outside of that run he was very leaky and seemed to have a low panic threshold.
And for a big guy was never as good at clearing out the front of the net as he should have been.
You're selling him short in terms of how good he was at one point, and for how long. He absolutely had his deficiencies, yes, but before his hips exploded, he was clearly more mobile, and those deficiencies didn't show much more than any other bottom-4 defenseman. That panic threshold was brutal, but again only in the back half of his career. His loss of mobility was an absolute game-changer for him because, as has been said, the mobility was only average-ish to begin with.He was very good in 2009 playoff run, but outside of that run he was very leaky and seemed to have a low panic threshold.
And for a big guy was never as good at clearing out the front of the net as he should have been.
I know nothing about him but he's a big right handed dman
Big body right handed defensive defenseman. I'd say it's a sure bet we sign him
Bumping this one, if Nick likes him, might see an ELC contract before his rights expiry date
Bumping this one, if Nick likes him, might see an ELC contract before his rights expiry date
I think it's worth signing him and giving him some runway to figure things out.
Bumping this one, if Nick likes him, might see an ELC contract before his rights expiry date
Johansson is much more offensively inclined, better skater too. However his problem is he can be a mess defensively at times.Think the development of Johansson affected on the decision with Andrew Gibson. They were kind of from the same mold. 3rd pair physical RD slot is open after Seider and Pellikka for the long future.
Link?
Thank you.![]()
Red Wings sign defenseman Anton Johansson to three-year, entry-level contract | Detroit Red Wings
Blueliner was selected by Detroit in fourth round of 2022 NHL entry draftwww.nhl.com
This kid keeps adding to his intrigue.
He’s played 8 pro games in NA now. First 4 games: 0 points, -3. Next 4 games: 5A, +6.
5P in 8 games is a pretty good stat line for a 20 year old rookie new to North American ice. Can anyone comment on whether they think this is something he can build on or is it more flukey than that?
I was at his first game in GR this year. He had a couple moments where it looked like he needed to adjust to the game a bit, but to me he looked more "NHL" player than any of the other D down there. He has some underrated bite to his game too. If he puts some weight on he could be a fairly physical, 2 way D in DetroitThis kid keeps adding to his intrigue.
He’s played 8 pro games in NA now. First 4 games: 0 points, -3. Next 4 games: 5A, +6.
5P in 8 games is a pretty good stat line for a 20 year old rookie new to North American ice. Can anyone comment on whether they think this is something he can build on or is it more flukey than that?