Boston Bruins ‘22-‘23 Bruins roster and trade proposals discussions. IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,838
19,793
Foligno is on pace for 39.75 points this year and plays on the fourth line so maybe you should unpin your eyes.
A2C20C8E-E089-4FC2-A193-CA3228FFDFD2.gif
 

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,315
18,815
Newton, MA.
Almost anything they do will require two or three trades to clear space. One or two trades to clear space, then the trade they want. Given that, the most I see is a Tommy Wingels type bottom six player.

Ah, the immortal Tommy Wingles. A name to strike fear into the heart of any opponent.

Jim Wiemer was a pretty bad dude, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oates2Neely

Bad Hat Harry

Michael Scarn
Sep 27, 2010
1,472
283
Boston, MA
The only thing worse than the terrible trade suggestions, bad takes, and off-the-wall analysis, is the endless replies ripping people for these goofball posts.

In a world full of change, it's comforting to know this place stays the same.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Gordoff

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,838
19,793
Exactly.

Kept hitting next page hoping to see the discussion move on but instead its just a continuation of unoriginal circle jerk posts making fun of the same thing.

Honestly shouldn't be surprised at this point.
I enjoy the scolding of the people who make fun of the people who make stupid proposals. Always my favorite part.
 

Gonzothe7thDman

Registered User
Jun 24, 2007
15,784
15,936
Central, Ma
I enjoy the scolding of the people who make fun of the people who make stupid proposals. Always my favorite part.

Yes fantastic contribution, really helping the discussion to move on.

This point doesn't make any sense considering there's been a few pages on it now and we haven't moved on. So yea, commenting on it is necessary.

Try again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,061
11,218
NWO
This point doesn't make any sense considering there's been plenty of time to move on and we haven't. So yea, commenting on it is necessary.

Try again.
Right, everyone knows the way to keep the discussion moving is to complain about the people who are actually discussing hockey rather than to add anything new. Very necessary for you to make posts that have nothing to do about trade rumors and free agent talks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pearljamvs5

danpantz

Registered User
Mar 31, 2013
8,100
11,583
Anyways, I mentioned this in the last thread but it got buried by the smith waive.

Any interest in Kevin Hayes? Reports are Philly is looking to buy him out in the off-season. Would actually be cheaper to trade him at 50% retained than to buy him out.

Big body center. 30 years old. Pacing around 70 points on a bad team.

Could he take a cheap deal after a buyout to play in his hometown? Could maybe get him at the deadline, has a 12 team no trade list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,061
11,218
NWO
Anyways, I mentioned this in the last thread but it got buried by the smith waive.

Any interest in Kevin Hayes? Reports are Philly is looking to buy him out in the off-season. Would actually be cheaper to trade him at 50% retained than to buy him out.

Big body center. 30 years old. Pacing around 70 points on a bad team.

Could he take a cheap deal after a buyout to play in his hometown? Could maybe get him at the deadline, has a 12 team no trade list.
How many years does he have left....quite a few no? Had some injury concerns recently not sure he's someone you want long term. Skill wise wouldn't be a bad guy to play 2C if Krejci/Bergy retire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

danpantz

Registered User
Mar 31, 2013
8,100
11,583
How many years does he have left....quite a few no? Had some injury concerns recently not sure he's someone you want long term. Skill wise wouldn't be a bad guy to play 2C if Krejci/Bergy retire.

3 years after this one. If 50% retained looking at a 3.6 ish cap hit.
 

Gonzothe7thDman

Registered User
Jun 24, 2007
15,784
15,936
Central, Ma
Right, everyone knows the way to keep the discussion moving is to complain about the people who are actually discussing hockey rather than to add anything new. Very necessary for you to make posts that have nothing to do about trade rumors and free agent talks.

Guess you're just going to add to the low effort cj conversation. Apparently you'd prefer we keep quoting each other saying 'you're derailing the conversation" ----"No you're derailing the conversation"----"No you" completely missing the point.

I'm all set. Have a good one.


Anyways, I mentioned this in the last thread but it got buried by the smith waive.

Any interest in Kevin Hayes? Reports are Philly is looking to buy him out in the off-season. Would actually be cheaper to trade him at 50% retained than to buy him out.

Big body center. 30 years old. Pacing around 70 points on a bad team.

Could he take a cheap deal after a buyout to play in his hometown? Could maybe get him at the deadline, has a 12 team no trade list.

I don't believe the Hayes family likes the Bruins org.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,061
11,218
NWO
3 years after this one. If 50% retained looking at a 3.6 ish cap hit.
Not a bad bridge actually, probably a guy to grab in the offseason though more than anything.

Guess you're just going to add to the low effort cj conversation. Apparently you'd prefer we keep quoting each other saying 'you're derailing the conversation" ----"No you're derailing the conversation"----"No you" completely missing the point.

I'm all set. Have a good one.




I don't believe the Hayes family likes the Bruins org.
I think you completely missed the point of your own post....if you think the thread is turning into a circle jerk why not ignore it or help move the subject rather than add more unhelpful posts to it?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Gonzothe7thDman
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad