User13452
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2022
- 3,216
- 4,966
The more I see that reply the more I can’t figure out how that wasn’t a good goal lmao
My only guess on the goalie interference is they believe there wasn’t enough of a push by Pionk that’s literally the only thing I can think of but it still doesn’t make sense
those are cool.1920:
1921:
And that's just stuff I could find quickly.
The Rangers used a wordmark in a style that was already established in hockey and broader sports design. If you wear a jersey with a single letter logo on the front, are you "ripping off" the Wanderers or whoever? No, it's just a common style that you're using, just like putting your logo inside a circle. The Canes aren't ripping anyone off, nor are the Rangers, they're both just using a lettering style that's more or less as old as hockey itself. The reason so few teams in the NHL have used it is because it was historically considered to be downmarket and cheap- printing lettering being a lot cheaper than making a complex custom crest.those are cool.
Maybe the Canes ripped them off?
Or maybe they ripped off the team that’s worn it for 100 years and not the “Eskimos”
He did manage to high stick him too, that may have been the tiebreakerYea Hall, that's a hook...of course there has been plenty not unilaterally applied the other direction, unsurprisingly
Hall penalty was deserved though.Refs getting their desired outcome.