Proposal: Zuccarello+ for Panarin

[WesMcCauley]

Zuccarello+Hayes+Lindberg for panarin?

Zucc:60+ points last season, very solid topline twoway forward, great contract(4,5 for 3 more years).
Hayes:45 points in rookie season, struggled a little last season but has tons of talent. Locked up for 2 years at 2,6, rfa after that. Great size and hands.
Lindberg: Very good twoway middle six forward who can develop into a top 6 forward. Very responsible twoway player, 650k cap hit, rfa after this season. 13 goals-28 points in 68 games last season.

Would obviously not happen before next summer because of the cap and Chi not beeing able to take on the extra cap hit this season. All of the players will be able to contribute in the next 5 years which most likely is the cup window for Chicago.

What do we think? Zucc to old(28 i think)? Want a younger player who scores top line or top 6 points? Is it to much salary coming back to Chi?

Zucc+Buchnevich a better option for example?

Click to read more...

 

[Legend123]

why would chicago do this? The reason they might be forced to trade Panarin is cuz of the cap. He wants 7-8M.
Your package of players will make around 8M.

Chicago needs a replacement for Panarin at a cheap price. Maybe Zucc + 1rst + Vesey could work.

 

[MMC]

Can't imagine Chicago wants anything to do with Hayes.

 

[WannabeFinn]

So Chicago traded quality for quantity without even saving much cap space, if any at all. Seems rather pointless.

 

[WesMcCauley]

So Chicago traded quality for quantity without even saving much cap space, if any at all. Seems rather pointless.

I get what you are saying but they get a cheaper top line player and add two middle six forwards with low cap hits. They get alot deeper in the middle 6 and can trade a guy like Krueger who has a pretty high cap hit for the role he has(4th line C) in Chicago and save cap that way.

 

[WesMcCauley]

How about Zucc+Buchnevich?

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

Zucc+Buch is too much. I don't think the difference between Zucc and Panarin is Buch, especially considering we don't have Patrick Kane. Panarin probably isn't more than a 65 point player on the Rangers, which is really good and he might be our best forward at 65 points, but not for Zucc+Buch. We project Buch to be somewhere around Panarin's level eventually, if you consider what Panarin's production would be without Kane, so around 65 points.

Maybe Zucc+Hayes or Zucc+Vesey.

If you want, Panarin+Pokka for Zucc+Miller could be a fair deal.

 

[Pyromaniac]

Hayes... *puke*

 

[GAGLine]

why would chicago do this? The reason they might be forced to trade Panarin is cuz of the cap. He wants 7-8M.
Your package of players will make around 8M.

3 players making 8 mil is a lot different than 1 player making 8 mil.

 

[BLNY]

Hawks laugh at that one.

 

[gorangers0525]

Granted we don't have other NHL seasons to compare too, but Panarin's shooting percentage was pretty damn high. Could just as well come crashing down to earth, don't want to take that risk.

 

[Brock Radunske]

How about Zucc+Buchnevich?

That's fair value I think.

 

[Kshahdoo]

I think Zucc is a player Panarin could be traded for, but it won't happen untill the next season. Right now Panarin is on ELC, which is better than Zuccarello's contract.

 

[Rebels57]

Zuccarello+Hayes+Lindberg for panarin?

Zucc:60+ points last season, very solid topline twoway forward, great contract(4,5 for 3 more years).
Hayes:45 points in rookie season, struggled a little last season but has tons of talent. Locked up for 2 years at 2,6, rfa after that. Great size and hands.
Lindberg: Very good twoway middle six forward who can develop into a top 6 forward. Very responsible twoway player, 650k cap hit, rfa after this season. 13 goals-28 points in 68 games last season.

Would obviously not happen before next summer because of the cap and Chi not beeing able to take on the extra cap hit this season. All of the players will be able to contribute in the next 5 years which most likely is the cup window for Chicago.

What do we think? Zucc to old(28 i think)? Want a younger player who scores top line or top 6 points? Is it to much salary coming back to Chi?

Zucc+Buchnevich a better option for example?

The centerpiece of a trade for Panarin cannot be a player as old as Zuccarello.

 

[Cubs2024wildcard]

Can't see the Hawks wanting anything to do with Hayes.

 

[New Jersey]

Well, if anyone's gonna give Panarin $7M+...

 

[One Winged Angel]

Well, if anyone's gonna give Panarin $7M+...

If anyone's gonna make Bryce Salvador their captain...

 

[SEALBound]

How about Zucc+Buchnevich?

Actually...that ain't terrible...coming from a neutral fan.

 

[thedoughboy]

Zucc+Buch is too much. I don't think the difference between Zucc and Panarin is Buch, especially considering we don't have Patrick Kane. Panarin probably isn't more than a 65 point player on the Rangers, which is really good and he might be our best forward at 65 points, but not for Zucc+Buch. We project Buch to be somewhere around Panarin's level eventually, if you consider what Panarin's production would be without Kane, so around 65 points.

Maybe Zucc+Hayes or Zucc+Vesey.

If you want, Panarin+Pokka for Zucc+Miller could be a fair deal.

Panarin+TVR and I'd do it.

 

[Hictor Vedman*]

If anyone's gonna make Bryce Salvador their captain...

Making a locker room guy a captain pales in comparison to New York constantly signing mistake after mistake, and doing whatever they can to bury their mistakes so they can make fresh, new mistakes.

 

[jw2]

How is Chicago taking on any salary?

 

[WesMcCauley]

How is Chicago taking on any salary?

Difference between paying one guy 7 mill and 3 guys(1 top line-Zucc, 2 top 9 players-Hayes-Lindberg) 7 mill.

 

[jw2]

Difference between paying one guy 7 mill and 3 guys(1 top line-Zucc, 2 top 9 players-Hayes-Lindberg) 7 mill.

where is Chicago getting 7m in cap space?

 

[WesMcCauley]

where is Chicago getting 7m in cap space?

If you read the OP you would know it said it would obviously not happen before next summer because Chicago cant take on that much cap now

 

[Tavares91Stamkos91]

Zucc+Buch is too much. I don't think the difference between Zucc and Panarin is Buch, especially considering we don't have Patrick Kane. Panarin probably isn't more than a 65 point player on the Rangers, which is really good and he might be our best forward at 65 points, but not for Zucc+Buch. We project Buch to be somewhere around Panarin's level eventually, if you consider what Panarin's production would be without Kane, so around 65 points.

Maybe Zucc+Hayes or Zucc+Vesey.

If you want, Panarin+Pokka for Zucc+Miller could be a fair deal.

Really because Panarin is quite a bit better than Zuccarello IMO?