Toggle sidebar

Proposal: Zuccarello+ for Panarin

WesMcCauley

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
Zuccarello+Hayes+Lindberg for panarin?

Zucc:60+ points last season, very solid topline twoway forward, great contract(4,5 for 3 more years).
Hayes:45 points in rookie season, struggled a little last season but has tons of talent. Locked up for 2 years at 2,6, rfa after that. Great size and hands.
Lindberg: Very good twoway middle six forward who can develop into a top 6 forward. Very responsible twoway player, 650k cap hit, rfa after this season. 13 goals-28 points in 68 games last season.

Would obviously not happen before next summer because of the cap and Chi not beeing able to take on the extra cap hit this season. All of the players will be able to contribute in the next 5 years which most likely is the cup window for Chicago.

What do we think? Zucc to old(28 i think)? Want a younger player who scores top line or top 6 points? Is it to much salary coming back to Chi?

Zucc+Buchnevich a better option for example?
Click to read more...
 
Last edited:
Legend123

Legend123

Registered User
Jul 3, 2016
9,926
5,112
why would chicago do this? The reason they might be forced to trade Panarin is cuz of the cap. He wants 7-8M.
Your package of players will make around 8M.

Chicago needs a replacement for Panarin at a cheap price. Maybe Zucc + 1rst + Vesey could work.
 
WesMcCauley

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
WannabeFinn said:
So Chicago traded quality for quantity without even saving much cap space, if any at all. Seems rather pointless.
Click to expand...

I get what you are saying but they get a cheaper top line player and add two middle six forwards with low cap hits. They get alot deeper in the middle 6 and can trade a guy like Krueger who has a pretty high cap hit for the role he has(4th line C) in Chicago and save cap that way.
 
Pavel Buchnevich

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,144
26,848
New York
Zucc+Buch is too much. I don't think the difference between Zucc and Panarin is Buch, especially considering we don't have Patrick Kane. Panarin probably isn't more than a 65 point player on the Rangers, which is really good and he might be our best forward at 65 points, but not for Zucc+Buch. We project Buch to be somewhere around Panarin's level eventually, if you consider what Panarin's production would be without Kane, so around 65 points.

Maybe Zucc+Hayes or Zucc+Vesey.

If you want, Panarin+Pokka for Zucc+Miller could be a fair deal.
 
GAGLine

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,372
21,353
Legend123 said:
why would chicago do this? The reason they might be forced to trade Panarin is cuz of the cap. He wants 7-8M.
Your package of players will make around 8M.
Click to expand...

3 players making 8 mil is a lot different than 1 player making 8 mil.
 

gorangers0525

Registered User
Dec 15, 2014
2,751
687
Granted we don't have other NHL seasons to compare too, but Panarin's shooting percentage was pretty damn high. Could just as well come crashing down to earth, don't want to take that risk.
 

Kshahdoo

Registered User
Mar 23, 2008
20,458
10,245
Moscow, Russia
I think Zucc is a player Panarin could be traded for, but it won't happen untill the next season. Right now Panarin is on ELC, which is better than Zuccarello's contract.
 
Rebels57

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,149
125,688
meldelaget said:
Zuccarello+Hayes+Lindberg for panarin?

Zucc:60+ points last season, very solid topline twoway forward, great contract(4,5 for 3 more years).
Hayes:45 points in rookie season, struggled a little last season but has tons of talent. Locked up for 2 years at 2,6, rfa after that. Great size and hands.
Lindberg: Very good twoway middle six forward who can develop into a top 6 forward. Very responsible twoway player, 650k cap hit, rfa after this season. 13 goals-28 points in 68 games last season.

Would obviously not happen before next summer because of the cap and Chi not beeing able to take on the extra cap hit this season. All of the players will be able to contribute in the next 5 years which most likely is the cup window for Chicago.

What do we think? Zucc to old(28 i think)? Want a younger player who scores top line or top 6 points? Is it to much salary coming back to Chi?

Zucc+Buchnevich a better option for example?
Click to expand...

The centerpiece of a trade for Panarin cannot be a player as old as Zuccarello.
 
thedoughboy

thedoughboy

Registered User
Feb 22, 2015
1,594
5
Tinyest of the fifty
Pavel Buchnevich said:
Zucc+Buch is too much. I don't think the difference between Zucc and Panarin is Buch, especially considering we don't have Patrick Kane. Panarin probably isn't more than a 65 point player on the Rangers, which is really good and he might be our best forward at 65 points, but not for Zucc+Buch. We project Buch to be somewhere around Panarin's level eventually, if you consider what Panarin's production would be without Kane, so around 65 points.

Maybe Zucc+Hayes or Zucc+Vesey.

If you want, Panarin+Pokka for Zucc+Miller could be a fair deal.
Click to expand...

Panarin+TVR and I'd do it.
 
Tavares91Stamkos91

Tavares91Stamkos91

Registered User
Oct 2, 2013
795
84
Vancouver
Pavel Buchnevich said:
Zucc+Buch is too much. I don't think the difference between Zucc and Panarin is Buch, especially considering we don't have Patrick Kane. Panarin probably isn't more than a 65 point player on the Rangers, which is really good and he might be our best forward at 65 points, but not for Zucc+Buch. We project Buch to be somewhere around Panarin's level eventually, if you consider what Panarin's production would be without Kane, so around 65 points.

Maybe Zucc+Hayes or Zucc+Vesey.

If you want, Panarin+Pokka for Zucc+Miller could be a fair deal.
Click to expand...

Really because Panarin is quite a bit better than Zuccarello IMO?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X