- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,548
- 39,391
Dach doesn’t even really motivate me to move zegras at all.
I feel like dach upside is a decent 2c(60ish points).
Proposal: Zegras -> MTL
- Thread starter Mackiaveli
- Start date
- Status
I feel like dach upside is a decent 2c(60ish points).
When they're lottery protected it's inherently an asset with value limitations. You get this pick unless it's high enough to help our rebuild then you gotta wait another year to find out where the pick ends up in the draft position blender. To say nothing of the fact that if it ends up being a 2025 pick, it's not as conducive to Anaheim's rebuild timeline.
I don't just say these things arbitrarily.
Nah only is it not fair, it is a laughable proposition.
That's fair enough, but he is at least an example one of the pieces that would need to be on the board. I don't really see Anaheim and Montreal as good trading partners anyway.
KirkAlbuquerque
#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
I don’t think Montreal can even afford Zegras (contract wise) at this point. Also, Dach would need to go the other way
Another problem is your top 3 forwards would be Suzuki, Caufield and Zegras. That could be a problem comes playoff time.
Another problem is your top 3 forwards would be Suzuki, Caufield and Zegras. That could be a problem comes playoff time.
ChaoticOrange
Registered User
Bold. Bold to dub the... well... bolded off the table for Trevor freaking Zegras.
I can't imagine Anaheim wants Montreal's fourth best prospect, seventh best roster player, or picks with conditions for a guy like that. Gotta give to get, and you're not giving anything you'd miss.
I just know that Habs fans are the type of people that send $150 offers for $600 items on facebook marketplace.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,548
- 39,391
Same... i feel like zegras wouldnt want to play in Montreal anyway.... no way i could see him signing 8 years.
Djp
Registered User
Zegras costs you Suzuki+ or 2 off Reinbscker , Slav, Caufield , top 5 pick.
Prairie Habs
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2010
- 12,269
- 13,420
I'm sure Ottawa was gutted when they only received a protected first for Karlsson and it ended up being stutzle.
Or Colorado when they got a protected 1st from the sens and it ended up giving them Byram at #4.
A team that's bad enough to be in the lottery will probably still be around the lottery the next year.
anezthes
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2014
- 4,760
- 3,138
Damn, was half-expecting Halak, Ryder and a 2nd.
Maybe so, but Anaheim is in no hurry to trade Zegras. In any case this is a pointless exercise in semantics. When I said scraps I was clearly referring to here have two players from this group of guys with middling to low value and/or more uncertain potential.
Prairie Habs
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2010
- 12,269
- 13,420
It was 2 1sts from non-playoff teams + any prospect outside the top 3 from a top ~5 prospect pool in the league.
The fact adding matheson was an OVERPAYMENT for TREVOR ZEGRAS was the big lol for me
Lt Dan
F*** your ice cream!
I never understand these threads. Zegras is going nowhere. I know it's the offseason, but....
I get what people are saying but honesty find a comparison and see how much they got. How much better is Zegras then Fiala, PLD, etc
He won’t be traded but if he did demand a trade and sat out a year ( played this year in KHL ) then next offseason I could see him going for that package maybe less because he’d be absolutely hated by fans/teammates but I guess he isn’t a like that so the point is moot? Idk not going to be traded so I’m just don’t see a plausible situation besides that.
He won’t be traded but if he did demand a trade and sat out a year ( played this year in KHL ) then next offseason I could see him going for that package maybe less because he’d be absolutely hated by fans/teammates but I guess he isn’t a like that so the point is moot? Idk not going to be traded so I’m just don’t see a plausible situation besides that.
ChaoticOrange
Registered User
it's a shitty offer, and you know it's a shitty offer. nobody wants to be on the receiving end of a quantity offer. Zegras differs from the likes of Fiala, Dubois, Duchene, because he's only 22 years old. A couple of firsts and a B prospect is what you pay for a 27 year old with a trade demand, not a young star with the bad fortune to be on a terrible team.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,548
- 39,391
Tough to compare zegras to fiala/PLD situations. And the obvious age difference and potential difference.
At the time of PLD and Fiala trade we basically knew what they were as NHL talent.... for zegras its still pretty unknown how good he can actually be.
Ducks have one of, if not the, deepest prospect pools in hockey. IF they move Z, it'll probably be a 1 for 1 or attaching another asset to him to get a better player/better fit. Ducks should be done selling for futures and trying to get back into competing for playoffs.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,548
- 39,391
Problem is Anaheim is stacked on d prospects, I don’t think we could realistically part with a top forward prospect for a d prospect. Another reason why I don’t think Anaheim and Montreal would make good trade partners.
You’re getting Zegras, and Newhook is untouchable?
No deal with a D can be made They already got Drysdale Zelleweger Warren Minty, Luneau and Helleson. They have enough D. If Montréal want to get Zegras it start with Dach, a 1st and more.
To me The price doesn't worth it but Zegras Had a very high value
doubt much would entice Duck fans to move him, and I would be the same way if Zegras was a king. Still if, and its a big if, things sour between him and the Ducks crazier things have happened. Would take more than this though. From Montreal would think Slafkovsky ++
When they get 1sts for Monahan and Edmundson they can add those as well
- Status
