Steve Yzerlland
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2018
- 9,139
- 4,716
So how did Blashill destroy his confidence? And if he could actually even do that what does it say about Zadina?Because not everyone is the same?
Last edited by a moderator:
So how did Blashill destroy his confidence? And if he could actually even do that what does it say about Zadina?Because not everyone is the same?
You really believe that bs? Why didn't he destroy Raymond and Seiders confidence?
Who knows. It says that a young person in a new country can be negatively impacted by a person that wields extraordinary power of his career and future. Coaches can really f*** someone up if they aren't careful.So how did Blashill destroy his confidence? And if he could actually even do that what does it say about Zadina?
He actually gave Raymond a chance by putting him with Larkin, what did we do with Zadina? a.k.a killing his confidenceWhy you still working there then? And there is a thing called toxic positivity. Zadina hasn't shown he is worth term...
So how did Blashill destroy his confidence? And if he could actually even do that what does it say about Zadina?
To be clear here. This is everything to do with personality and psychology as well as a little dash of power dynamics in the work place. The only part talent may have played is that Raymond and Seider were going off the rip and didn't struggle at the NHL pace. Means there is less 'coaching' to be done to them.Because elite talent is more resilient.
He made it to the NHL with fragile confidence? Sounds legit.Because elite talent is more resilient.
And what evidence do you have that Blashill abused his power on Zadina? Where is the PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY for a player?! Wtf is going on around here?Who knows. It says that a young person in a new country can be negatively impacted by a person that wields extraordinary power of his career and future. Coaches can really f*** someone up if they aren't careful.
Perhaps but like I said this next season he better shove all his chips in the middle. He was touted as an elite goal scorer. That was his calling card and I've yet to see him look like he can dominate with any consistency.The 3 years gives me some indication that Yzerman thinks he has more potential than he's shown. At the very least, perhaps he projects him as a 3rd line threat and 2nd power play option.
You really believe that bs? Why didn't he destroy Raymond and Seiders confidence?
How did Blashill destroy Zadina's confidence? So when he rarely produces it was in spite of his coach? You guys aren't serious.Because they’re different people who were coached differently?
Because all three of them are very different people and both Seider and Raymond had pretty much immediate NHL success?
He made it to the NHL with fragile confidence? Sounds legit.
And what evidence do you have that Blashill abused his power on Zadina? Where is the PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY for a player?! Wtf is going on around here?
Perhaps but like I said this next season he better shove all his chips in the middle. He was touted as an elite goal scorer. That was his calling card and I've yet to see him look like he can dominate with any consistency.
I'd say, talent is not only about body types, measurements or skills, it also includes the mental side.To be clear here. This is everything to do with personality and psychology as well as a little dash of power dynamics in the work place. The only part talent may have played is that Raymond and Seider were going off the rip and didn't struggle at the NHL pace. Means there is less 'coaching' to be done to them.
Raymond didn't prove he deserved to play with Larkin? Blashill just did it to kill Zadina's confidence? This slope just keeps getting slipperier and slipperier... It's the world's fault.He actually gave Raymond a chance by putting him with Larkin, what did we do with Zadina? a.k.a killing his confidence
I said accountability not responsibility... and none of this has any relevance to blaming his coach because he looks like a bust.Zadina’s personal responsibility is that he started gripping his stick tighter and tried to do more, which conversely causes him to do less. Like the baseball hitter who is straining really hard but not attacking the pitch. The pitcher who is trying to aim and throw his pitch perfectly as opposed to just trusting his stuff. The goalie (such as Mrazek or Howard) who cheats to make up for the fact that he’s out of shape and slow and therefore gives up more shitty goals.
That’s on him. Confidence is a weird damn thing. Zadina still has the shot and scoring touch that led him to be #3 ranked behind Svech and Dahlin.
You really believe that bs? Why didn't he destroy Raymond and Seiders confidence?
Did I say that he did? I was saying that you can’t say “Raymond and Seider didn’t struggle, so it can’t be related to coaching”.How did Blashill destroy Zadina's confidence? So when he rarely produces it was in spite of his coach? You guys aren't serious.
He actually gave Raymond a chance by putting him with Larkin, what did we do with Zadina? a.k.a killing his confidence
So you are saying all this to say it was Jeff Blashill's fault Filip Zadina couldn't score. He should have played him over Raymond when Lucas looks and is the clearly better player so he doesn't "destroy" his confidence. If it weren't for Blashill Zadina would look like a star?Seider and Raymond both experienced immediate success and were extended a significant amount of trust from Blashill and the coaching staff. With the way they started, there was very little do to damage the confidence they brought to the game.
As for Zadina, I think it’s more about not building confidence more than it is destroying confidence. If he had any last year, it really didn’t show. I know from watching him as far back as his draft year…it doesn’t take much to see him in a confident frame of mind.
Where Blashill really did a number on Zadina was the same thing we saw with Mantha or Cholowski. It’s impossible for players to feel confident and relax when they feel like there is a target on their back. Not that it’s malicious, but imagine how you’d go through life if someone was watching and waiting for the first sign of a mistake and they punished you for it.
Zadina missing a defensive assignment meant that he was playing 10 minutes the next night. It meant that he took 2 shifts in the next period. It meant playing with Givani Smith and Carter Rowney. Conversely, Fabbri literally handing the puck away to the other team with numbers or taking a horrifically timed third period slashing penalty meant what? It meant he was right back on the ice as soon as his penalty was served.
Zadina just never built confidence under Blashill because every mistake was a benching of some sort. And then eventually you start believing that you aren’t capable of producing and start trying to force things to happen. And then you start second guessing your decisions and your reaction times look slow.
That’s why people throw out the concept of “unlocking” him. Let him start to believe that he can play his game and not be micromanaged. It’s something that Lalonde has talked about in depth regarding his philosophy. He lets people play their offensive game so long as they take care of the defensive responsibilities that he asks. As long as you pull your weight, he won’t lose his shit for trying to allow your creativity to shine.
And if that doesn’t work for Zadina…well then we are probably talking about calling it a wrap.
I have yet to hear one person focus any blame to Zadina's performance on ZADINA! Like how?Just like for Raymond, Blashill gave him Zadina chance to play with Larkin.
But everybody has forget everything, thanks to Blashill hate.
Especially the term. He has done nothing to earn three years.I actually really hate this.
That doesn't count.Just like for Raymond, Blashill gave Zadina a chance to play with Larkin year earlier.
But everybody has forget everything, thanks to Blashill hate.
Proven fact:
At season 2020-21, Zadina played most minutes with Dylan Larkin, 2nd most with Namestnikov.
I think that's Yzerman's reasoning. If he wakes up he is under control for 2 more years. I doubt he ever becomes even half of what we thought he would be. I was expecting him to lead us in goals or at least be in the top 5!!!There's really no downside here, not sure what people are complaining about. If he ends up being a decent (15-20G/40-50P or more), this is a great deal. If he continues to suck, they can find a way to get rid of him or just deal with paying him $1.8 million, which won't impact the team at all.
Watching the games and reading Zadina's body language, it's pretty clear that his confidence has bottomed out in the NHL. His ability to generate opportunities and not convert them into anything has been astounding so far. It's not uncommon among players known for their goal scoring to get pretty down on themselves if they have an extended goal drought. Look at all of the stupid penalties Kucherov takes every year when things aren't going in for him. The more that you want something, the more that it can impact you, and recognizing that these 20 year old's are people like anyone else that can struggle with confidence.He made it to the NHL with fragile confidence? Sounds legit.
And what evidence do you have that Blashill abused his power on Zadina? Where is the PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY for a player?! Wtf is going on around here?
Perhaps but like I said this next season he better shove all his chips in the middle. He was touted as an elite goal scorer. That was his calling card and I've yet to see him look like he can dominate with any consistency.
I doubt we pay that year three lol.Interesting to note that the deal is heavily backloaded:
- Year 1: $915k
- Year 2: $1.83m
- Year 3: $2.73m
That all definitely falls on Blashill for sure. I wonder if Tampa Bay knew he had a history of killing players confidence. That would explain how he instantly got another job....We were talking about Zadina building his confidence by going back to the AHL to start year 1.
When he was struggling, we said maybe playing against kids in the WJC could build his confidence.
When he struggled at the WJC, we said maybe playing on the top line could build his confidence.
When he struggled on the first line, we said maybe taking the pressure off and putting him on line 3/4 could build his confidence.
...I'm starting to think he's just not very good at hockey