m9
m9
- Jan 23, 2010
- 25,107
- 15,230
I dont think you can ever fix the "acceleration" for a guy that big.
Absolutely you can, there are lots of workouts and exercises to work on burst and explosion.
I dont think you can ever fix the "acceleration" for a guy that big.
The big issue with Kassian right now is his skating. He is actually really fast for a young, big guy in terms of north-south speed, but he is not quick enough in those small areas. Once he improves that first step speed and strength, he will no longer seem like he's constantly one step behind and therefore able to make a lot more plays.
I dont think you can ever fix the "acceleration" for a guy that big.
To me...he is the 'anti-Gallagher'.
Kassian is huge, but he too often seems to forget it, and plays like he's not a physical monster. He floats, he stands around, he tries to play the game of a 'pure skill' player. And while he does have some skill (for a big guy) he's not going to be successful playing that way.
Brendan Gallagher on the other hand...is a total runt. Looks like a Peewee player wandered out onto the ice during a game and doesn't seem to realize just how small he is. Fights hard every shift, goes after anyone and everyone, dogs the puck relentlessly, goes to the net hard and pays the price constantly around the crease but just keeps at it.
Obviously part of it is the skating...acceleration, short-area quickness in particular that Gallagher has over Kassian. But if Zack Kassian could adopt even a fraction of that intensity and aggressiveness on a consistent basis...he'd be a beast.
Kassian has those flashes where it's like someone jolted him with a cattle-prod and he goes out and starts hitting and battling and getting engaged physically. But then it just tapers off until it's gone far too quickly. It just doesn't feel like there's any 'killer instinct' there, so much as...he knows that's what's expected of him so he'll indulge occasionally. A lot like...Dustin Penner.
It's what i thought when we acquired him, and i still don't see any reason to think otherwise...it's really hard to see him breaking the 25g mark with any regularity. So we're talking...Mason Raymond type production, but with a very different 'style'. How much is that different style worth? I guess we'll see. Unless he miraculously puts it together and develops a 'Gallagher-like' attitude....in which case, sky's the limit.
To me...he is the 'anti-Gallagher'.
Kassian is huge, but he too often seems to forget it, and plays like he's not a physical monster. He floats, he stands around, he tries to play the game of a 'pure skill' player. And while he does have some skill (for a big guy) he's not going to be successful playing that way.
Brendan Gallagher on the other hand...is a total runt. Looks like a Peewee player wandered out onto the ice during a game and doesn't seem to realize just how small he is. Fights hard every shift, goes after anyone and everyone, dogs the puck relentlessly, goes to the net hard and pays the price constantly around the crease but just keeps at it.
Acceleration isn't a natural born talent, you can learn how to accelerate properly, and effectively. Why else would NHL'ers be taking personal lessons with skating coaches? To become a more explosive skater. You can improve skating, for sure.
Absolutely.
Todd Bertuzzi had 36 points in his first 116 games.
Keith Primeau had 31 points in his first 97 games.
Joe Thornton had 48 points in his first 138 games.
Zack Kassian has 21 points in his first 83 games.
Did you want me to keep going?
I don't get it ?
So is your point that Kassian has a clearly lower PPG in his early career than all of these other guys that went on to have great careers? This despite being given more 1st/2nd line minutes than these other guys.
![]()
I was practicing my shooping skills and thought this was hilarious.
![]()
I was practicing my shooping skills and thought this was hilarious.
I don't get it ?
So is your point that Kassian has a clearly lower PPG in his early career than all of these other guys that went on to have great careers? This despite being given more 1st/2nd line minutes than these other guys.
I don't get it ?
So is your point that Kassian has a clearly lower PPG in his early career than all of these other guys that went on to have great careers? This despite being given more 1st/2nd line minutes than these other guys.
I think *the point* is that all of these guys went on to have great careers despite having slow starts. It shows that a low PPG in the first 100-150 for power-forward type players isn't terribly predictive of their future success.
I suppose you can compare their PPG and say Kassian is lower if you want, but that isn't the point. Unless you think Thornton's 0.35 PPG was a clear predictor his future success and Kassian's 0.25 PPG dooms him to never get any better ...
That's a horribly misleading comparison. Thornton made the transition to NHL directly after being drafted and in just his second year in the NHL had 0.5 ppg and only improved from there.
At the same age kassian hasn't had a sniff of the NHL yet. In fact, he's 4 years removed from his draft and can barely put up 0.25ppg in the NHL. Joe Thornton 4 years out of his draft had 71 points in 72 games.
please dont become Steve Bernier!![]()
That's a horribly misleading comparison. Thornton made the transition to NHL directly after being drafted and in just his second year in the NHL had 0.5 ppg and only improved from there.
At the same age kassian hasn't had a sniff of the NHL yet. In fact, he's 4 years removed from his draft and can barely put up 0.25ppg in the NHL. Joe Thornton 4 years out of his draft had 71 points in 72 games.