Rumor: - Zach Werenski rejected trade to Dallas with NMC | Page 30 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Rumor: Zach Werenski rejected trade to Dallas with NMC

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.11 on Monday July 20, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
1.) leafs fans would have killed to have Marner tell us this 2 years ago

2.) say it's Tampa and Toronto. What is the better package?

Moser. Geekie prospect 1st

Or knies. Danford. Hildeby 1st?

I would think knies is worth more than moser?

Geekie seems to suck now. 1 goal at 22 is bad.
 
Both of those packages feel incredibly depressing to get back for a Norris trophy winner that just put up 81 points. Nothing against Knies but he's a winger and the position values are so different. Moser might be as great as Tampa fans say but that offensive output is terribad for a team like colombus that isn't exactly high octane to begin with. The prospects and picks from both sides are pedestrian at best.
 
Imo he wants carolina. Metro is the worst division in hockey and they need a qb to run their pp. last year was a fluke due to the league being awful to win the cup with that abysmal of a pp
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Breeze 44
He doesn’t want to stay in CBJ but would be willing to go to Toronto? And wants to win now? Huh??
I read he wants to go to Toronto too and couldn’t believe my eyes. I thought the recent bias was for US born players to get out of up here? Yet, here’s a great US player wanting to head north. Interesting if true. Kneis +++
 
Idk why ppl are mad at Werenski. He played his ass off on CBJ for years. He also has a right to refuse a trade to Dallas lol.

Anyways , Fold the franchise and replace it with Houston
 
1.) leafs fans would have killed to have Marner tell us this 2 years ago

2.) say it's Tampa and Toronto. What is the better package?

Moser. Geekie prospect 1st

Or knies. Danford. Hildeby 1st?

I would think knies is worth more than moser?

Geekie seems to suck now. 1 goal at 22 is bad.
Guarantee you Geekie is a more valuable prospect than Danford or Hildeby lol. Knies might be “better” than Moser but it’s debatable and he plays a much more premium position. Losing a Norris caliber defenseman and bringing in a top 20ish winger just feels like bad business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass
Both of those packages feel incredibly depressing to get back for a Norris trophy winner that just put up 81 points. Nothing against Knies but he's a winger and the position values are so different. Moser might be as great as Tampa fans say but that offensive output is terribad for a team like colombus that isn't exactly high octane to begin with. The prospects and picks from both sides are pedestrian at best.
You get the best deal you can and you move on. Teams that are willing to add Werenski doesn't want to make a lateral move. They want to make their team better right now. That's why most of the deals are usually future heavy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass
NMCs has to be revised for the future. Not specific to Werenski but we can't continue with these situations.
Teams are also welcome to not give them out. Just saying. I get they have become quite common as a way to keep AAVs down a bit but I feel like it’s just on GMs to not give these out so often. Can’t really fault players for exercising their rights.
 
You get the best deal you can and you move on. Teams that are willing to add Werenski doesn't want to make a lateral move. They want to make their team better right now. That's why most of the deals are usually future heavy.
This. I don’t really get why GMs drag these situations out so long. Most would be best served to just bring these things to closure and move on.
 
also all of were
Guarantee you Geekie is a more valuable prospect than Danford or Hildeby lol. Knies might be “better” than Moser but it’s debatable and he plays a much more premium position. Losing a Norris caliber defenseman and bringing in a top 20ish winger just feels like bad business.

Moser isn't near knies. At all. Geekie may be more valuable? But 22 years old. 1 goal and can't crack Pontus holmberg spot? Come on.

It will depend on what they want. Toronto package is better there easily. But if they need a d man back then its different I guess.

Also probably losing Marchenko?

So maybe trade him for a D. And

Knies/fantilli core to build around m
 
NMCs has to be revised for the future. Not specific to Werenski but we can't continue with these situations.
Nah, enough protecting shitty GM and owners from themselves. Just like the 57464615 year contracts they got rid of, if a team wants to hire a GM who wants to give them out, let them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad