PattyLafontaine
Registered User
- Apr 5, 2006
- 3,780
- 3,792
He is a bad guy.It’s shame that he’ll end up looking like the bad guy in all of this, despite sticking around through the worst of a rebuild. He could have forced a trade years ago.
He is a bad guy.It’s shame that he’ll end up looking like the bad guy in all of this, despite sticking around through the worst of a rebuild. He could have forced a trade years ago.
Don't think the flyers have what it takes for a trade. Not moving Martone and I dont know if Michkov has a ton of value anymore. Has some value but how muchThis has the flyers written all over it
Marner wasn’t wanted. Werenski is.why would he want to go to toronto? Marner didn't even want to go Toronto.
I read he wants to go to Toronto too and couldn’t believe my eyes. I thought the recent bias was for US born players to get out of up here? Yet, here’s a great US player wanting to head north. Interesting if true. Kneis +++He doesn’t want to stay in CBJ but would be willing to go to Toronto? And wants to win now? Huh??
Marner wasn’t wanted. Werenski is.
Guarantee you Geekie is a more valuable prospect than Danford or Hildeby lol. Knies might be “better” than Moser but it’s debatable and he plays a much more premium position. Losing a Norris caliber defenseman and bringing in a top 20ish winger just feels like bad business.1.) leafs fans would have killed to have Marner tell us this 2 years ago
2.) say it's Tampa and Toronto. What is the better package?
Moser. Geekie prospect 1st
Or knies. Danford. Hildeby 1st?
I would think knies is worth more than moser?
Geekie seems to suck now. 1 goal at 22 is bad.
You get the best deal you can and you move on. Teams that are willing to add Werenski doesn't want to make a lateral move. They want to make their team better right now. That's why most of the deals are usually future heavy.Both of those packages feel incredibly depressing to get back for a Norris trophy winner that just put up 81 points. Nothing against Knies but he's a winger and the position values are so different. Moser might be as great as Tampa fans say but that offensive output is terribad for a team like colombus that isn't exactly high octane to begin with. The prospects and picks from both sides are pedestrian at best.
Teams are also welcome to not give them out. Just saying. I get they have become quite common as a way to keep AAVs down a bit but I feel like it’s just on GMs to not give these out so often. Can’t really fault players for exercising their rights.NMCs has to be revised for the future. Not specific to Werenski but we can't continue with these situations.
Torontos best asset is a complinentary winger
How do you build around that?
This. I don’t really get why GMs drag these situations out so long. Most would be best served to just bring these things to closure and move on.You get the best deal you can and you move on. Teams that are willing to add Werenski doesn't want to make a lateral move. They want to make their team better right now. That's why most of the deals are usually future heavy.
They will never be touched in the CBA—but you can bet the franchises will begin to operate like a cartel and stop handing them out overnight.NMCs has to be revised for the future. Not specific to Werenski but we can't continue with these situations.
Guarantee you Geekie is a more valuable prospect than Danford or Hildeby lol. Knies might be “better” than Moser but it’s debatable and he plays a much more premium position. Losing a Norris caliber defenseman and bringing in a top 20ish winger just feels like bad business.
Kneis + McKenna? CBJ would have to accept that. Overpay?It's mckenna. Then Knies. Then the 2053 1st, i think that's their next one.
Nah, enough protecting shitty GM and owners from themselves. Just like the 57464615 year contracts they got rid of, if a team wants to hire a GM who wants to give them out, let them.NMCs has to be revised for the future. Not specific to Werenski but we can't continue with these situations.