Marek and Friedman discussed this briefly on Marek's show today. They raised an interesting point that many teams are less concerned about the 10th game (which burns a year of the ELC) than they are about the 40th game (which burns a year toward UFA status). In fact, Marek argues that burning a year off of the ELC can benefit the team more than the player because it can result in a cheaper second contract. I agree with this logic. I think they can, and should, keep Benson up for as long as he is playing well and not regressing. If they send him to WJC and rotate him in and out of the lineup, they might be able to keep him under 40 games. On the other hand, if he plays so well that they can't justify sitting him out, then that's a good problem to have. In any event, I'd keep him around as long as his play continues to warrant it.
I've been watching him pretty closely, and his details are pretty much pro level already. He's better away from the puck and defensively than many, if not most, of our other forwards. One could argue that he should be sent down with instructions to add 10 pounds of muscle -- like Reinhart -- but he finds ways to be effective even when he's getting knocked down and pushed around.
I am in the minority but I think he should back to junior. He is going to be a good to great player, but I do not see him contributing much this year. He needs to get stronger. Plus keeping him sends the signal this another development year. With Quinn coming back there is going to be a roster logjam that he can’t help solve. He isn’t the problem bit he isn’t the solution either. Yet.
Assuming no other injuries, I'd solve the roster problem by waiving or dumping Olofsson. His game has regressed in all aspects. He makes so many dumb decisions with the puck, isn't scoring, and adds nothing when he doesn't have the puck. He was better last year. Not sure what's going on with him.