FriendlyGhost92
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2023
- 3,621
- 8,126
Yzerman asked about Todd's comments. "To be honest I was day dreaming. I didn't hear anything he just said."
WTF.
WTF.

Dylan popped off, and now he's getting served. Rough one for Dylan and his supporters on this board.And what about the 5 minutes they spent emphasizing that when they are talking about leadership, they are not just talking about Larkin? That was just secret code for "Dylan Larkin is a little bitch"?
I'm not saying a trade is for sure happening, that's just where my guess leans towards.
But I do think it's funny that Yzerman's response is the opposite of what people in here were saying...lol
Now we're changing the narrative to "Larkin lit a fire under Yzerman". I do not think that's what happened. I think Yzerman and McLellan are clearly saying Larkin needs to step up and lead the room and not whine about adding guys.
I don't think it makes sense to buy out Tarasenko. He has a year left, just see if he can recover some play or let him drop off the roster.
Holl is the one that needs to be bought out.
If they can't make tangible changes, why would you expect Larkin to want to stay?Larkin has to ask out. Like it or not if those two talking right now cannot make tangible changes and make the playoffs Larkin will last longer than them.
I am glad he lit a fire under them. This is the first time he has had a pulse in one of these. Yzerman is always honest, glad somebody has kicked his ass in gear though and Larkin isn’t in trouble unless he asks out. It’s why he is the one that said it to begin with.
Love how Todd mentioned Marner by name. Give him a brinks truck!!
Yeah... seemed like he was trying his hardest to not throw under Tuomisto under the bus, but seems like it ain't gonna happen for him.Yeah I don't think Tuomisto is going to make it. Mentioned foot speed multiple times.
Seemed to be pretty positive on Wallinder.
The trade stuff notwithstanding, most of us simply said that it reflects very poorly on Larkin's leadership. Yzerman and McLellan both essentially said it reflects poorly on Larkin's leadership.I said it was overblown and I stand by it.
Professionals are allowed to challenge each other.
It's tough, I'm stealing something the winged wheel podcast guys said. But with the Tank buyout you save 3.1mil. Can you upgrade what he did with that money? The answer might be yes.I don't think it makes sense to buy out Tarasenko. He has a year left, just see if he can recover some play or let him drop off the roster.
Holl is the one that needs to be bought out.
I guess we shouldn't try then? Don't really see your point at all?Half the league is likely looking to give Marner a BRINKS truck, and half those teams are better than us.
Silverfoxes will do that to you sometimes.I have a crush on Todd I think
Careful, don't remove the narrative some people have where they believe the ownership is actively being cheap..."World class ownership". Doesn't sound like the Illitch's are blocking him from signing free agents
They did. Frankly Larkin's comments activated Yzerman and Todd a bit. Got to but heads a bit to make things better long term. A bit fiery press conference which is good.You know what I do have to say that the media is asking very good questions here.
It won't happen. Yzerman will never outbid other teams and Marner has no reason to come here other than money.I guess we shouldn't try then? Don't really see your point at all?
He is from here and his entire family lives here. Same reason Yzerman came back from Tampa. One of them just has a longer runway of circumstances to see that through and contractual guarantees.If they can't make tangible changes, why would you expect Larkin to want to stay?
I guess we shouldn't try then? Don't really see your point at all?
The trade stuff notwithstanding, most of us simply said that it reflects very poorly on Larkin's leadership. Yzerman and McLellan both essentially said it reflects poorly on Larkin's leadership.
Somebody leaked the I couldn’t get ownership approval on Stamkos story too. We look at that as a good thing because Stamkos looks cooked but that might be different on a top 5 pp. Overarching point is Chris wouldn’t approve it.Silverfoxed will do that to you sometimes.
Careful, don't remove the narrative some people have where they believe the ownership is actively being cheap...
They did. Frankly Larkin's comments activated Yzerman and Todd a bit. Got to but heads a bit to make things better long term. A bit fiery press conference which is good.
The answers gives confidence about this team's future.
Somebody made it up you mean.Somebody leaked the I couldn’t get ownership approval on Stamkos story too.
No bro, Yzerman doesn't care, Larkin is 100% in the right, Yzerman will just come out and say he would say the same thing when he was captain!!!!
Lol. He did the exact opposite of saying he would do the same thing. Called Larkin out as directly as possible for a guy as professional as he is. Yzerman translated into Jim Rutherford's vocabulary would probably have included a bunch of cursing.
Ever heard of confirmation bias?Keep parroting that. Now that Yzerman's comments are the exact opposite of what the guys in here were telling us, I wonder where the goal posts will shift to next.
It's clear as day that Yzerman and McLellan are very unhappy with Larkin's leadership based on this interview.
You can call it that if you like. I'm not saying a trade is for sure happening but I didn't hear anything to indicate he is happy with Larkin's leadership.Ever heard of confirmation bias?
Leaked it or made it up?Somebody leaked the I couldn’t get ownership approval on Stamkos story too. We look at that as a good thing because Stamkos looks cooked but that might be different on a top 5 pp. Overarching point is Chris wouldn’t approve it.