Agreed.I'll pitch one name for now:
Underrated:
Eric Lindros: He seems to be considered a fringe top 100 player at this point. I feel a lot of people have forgotten or don't realize how good he was in his prime and punish him too much for games missed in an era where a lot of the most talented players were often banged up and out of the line-up. I wasn't a huge fan of his growing up, but he was the real deal. He was dominant. There is data that indicates that he impacted goal differential at even strength positively to a degree very few ever have. People hold his lack of playoff success against him as well. I think he showed in '97 that he could be a force in the post season. He wasn't quite McDavid 2024 good, but he played at a level one would expect from the best player in the League. He really only had one more opportunity in the playoffs during his prime.
I'd say he became underrated due to how hyped he was in his early years and for years after his prime ended. I think a lot of people who didn't follow or did not pay close attention when he was in his prime looked at his career on paper expecting a lot of top two, top three type scoring finishes (ala Crosby/McDavid) and were disappointed when they saw he was a top ten scorer just three times and a top five scorer only once. However, if you look at PPG numbers, he was consistently in the top five during his prime and this was with guys like Lemieux and Jagr in the League.
I do think he left a lot to be desired and you can give him some criticism for not playing with more precaution at times ; however, I feel his prime and peak have become underrated by many.
Watch Gretzky his final year. And see how he still owned the ice. Coming right after his 16th year as leader in NHL assists, and no Rag scoring more goals than his old *** that year, so no milking a trigger man like Pivonka and Backstrom did for my Caps' Bondra, OV.Here's an inflammatory one:
Mt. Rushmore overrated (for HF) are Gretzky, Lemieux, Howe, Orr.
I 90% agree.Underrated:
Impacts of coaching
Impacts of team chemistry and composition
Player durability
Total team defense
Overrated:
Fighting
Advanced stats
Per-game stats
Total team offense
OP didn't say it had to be individual players.
Underrated:
Impacts of coaching
Impacts of team chemistry and composition
Player durability
Total team defense
Overrated:
Fighting
Advanced stats
Per-game stats
Total team offense
OP didn't say it had to be individual players.
Team defense is a proxy for coaching (especially when coaching is listed)
Yes, Lindros is definitely the most underrated guy on this particular forum. (Didn't the recent top-100 players things barely have him in it...?) He outscored Jagr in 1995, matched Lemieux in 1997, was the League's biggest physical force, led the playoffs in scoring, was one of the fastest players ever to 500 points, tilted the ice at ES like few forwards ever, etc., but somehow this forum thinks Norm Ullman or whoever was better.I'll pitch one name for now:
Underrated:
Eric Lindros: He seems to be considered a fringe top 100 player at this point. I feel a lot of people have forgotten or don't realize how good he was in his prime and punish him too much for games missed in an era where a lot of the most talented players were often banged up and out of the line-up. I wasn't a huge fan of his growing up, but he was the real deal. He was dominant. There is data that indicates that he impacted goal differential at even strength positively to a degree very few ever have. People hold his lack of playoff success against him as well. I think he showed in '97 that he could be a force in the post season. He wasn't quite McDavid 2024 good, but he played at a level one would expect from the best player in the League. He really only had one more opportunity in the playoffs during his prime.
I'd say he became underrated due to how hyped he was in his early years and for years after his prime ended. I think a lot of people who didn't follow or did not pay close attention when he was in his prime looked at his career on paper expecting a lot of top two, top three type scoring finishes (ala Crosby/McDavid) and were disappointed when they saw he was a top ten scorer just three times and a top five scorer only once. However, if you look at PPG numbers, he was consistently in the top five during his prime and this was with guys like Lemieux and Jagr in the League.
I do think he left a lot to be desired and you can give him some criticism for not playing with more precaution at times ; however, I feel his prime and peak have become underrated by many.
i couldnt agree more.Here's an inflammatory one:
Mt. Rushmore overrated (for HF) are Gretzky, Lemieux, Howe, Orr
This board uses the parlance "big four" like it's inconceivable that anyone could be better (I'm not even talking about like McDavid or upcoming players being better), which in itself, sure I can get around.
The thing is, the legend of these players certainly seems to have grown since they played. Certainly seems to be the case for Gretzky and Lemieux, and also I'm familiar enough with the Original Six Wings to know what Howe was thought of then vs now (not as familiar/interested regarding Orr though when I looked up some stuff on Espo from back then and yeah same inflation seems to be happening for Orr).
You'd think with the way people talk about these guys here, they'd be winning the cup singlehandedly every year... just not the case lol
And Crosby (3rd), who missed more games than Lindros during their first 7 seasons...He's basically in a tier of his own in terms of lack of prime games played. Malkin and Forsberg jump out too.
That's very debatable. I'd say Lindros jumps Thornton, Fedorov, Dionne, Sakic, Yzerman, Clarke, and maybe Crosby and Malkin.Prime on prime he only jumps a few guys.
Am floored.... Shea Weber, ... for the overrated.
Kris Letang, ... for the underrated.
That's very debatable. I'd say Lindros jumps Thornton, Fedorov, Dionne, Sakic, Yzerman, Clarke, and maybe Crosby and Malkin.