Line Combos: Your 2024-25 Opening Night Lineup

Stammertime91

TBL: TEAM OF THE CENTURY
Dec 13, 2011
14,144
13,209
Tampa: NHL's Newest Dynasty
Guentzel - Point - Kucherov
Hagel - Cirelli - Atkinson
Sheary - Paul - Chaffee
Girgensons - Glendening - Eyssimont

Hedman - Raddysh
McDonagh - Cernak (what a sight this will be)
Moser - Perbix
Lilleberg


2/3RW are wide open if someone can impress at camp. I like Chaffee more than others but I'm not sold at the moment he's anything more than a 4th liner. The lack of RW's is concerning so interchanging that entire side is a crapshoot. It wouldn't surprise me if we stack three rats on a line to piss people off and even try Eyssimont on the second line.
 

Hockeyville USA

Registered User
Dec 30, 2023
3,204
2,912
Central Ohio
Guentzel - Point - Kucherov
Hagel - Cirelli - Atkinson
Sheary - Paul - Chaffee
Girgensons - Glendening - Eyssimont

Hedman - Raddysh
McDonagh - Cernak (what a sight this will be)
Moser - Perbix
Lilleberg


2/3RW are wide open if someone can impress at camp. I like Chaffee more than others but I'm not sold at the moment he's anything more than a 4th liner. The lack of RW's is concerning so interchanging that entire side is a crapshoot. It wouldn't surprise me if we stack three rats on a line to piss people off and even try Eyssimont on the second line.
Flip Chaffee and Eyssimont. Chaffee was horrific on the 3rd line to end last year.

Would love for a kid (Goncalves or Duke specifically) to steal a spot and force us to waive Sheary
 

Renopucker

Registered User
Jan 17, 2019
492
424
Reno
Flip Chaffee and Eyssimont. Chaffee was horrific on the 3rd line to end last year.

Would love for a kid (Goncalves or Duke specifically) to steal a spot and force us to waive Sheary
You know, with the exception of Sheary, I really like that FWD group, and the D is substantially improved with Moser and Mcd.. Cirelli's got 2 puckdogs on his wings. Their 5v5 should be stellar. Finally, I think Atkinson is gonna surprise us.
 

Maelmoor

Registered User
Apr 20, 2004
6,529
1,866
Stockholm, Sweden
For most, it feels quite settled. First line is obvious, we have the pieces for a great fourth line and guys like Hagel, Cirelli and Paul have their spots. Obviously the much talked 2nd line RW spot is up in the a air and also who will slot in on the third line with Paul, maybe Ylönen can take a place there.

As for the defense, Hedman, McD, Cernak and Moser is a really good top 4 and then we have Raddysh who can play with Hedman and hopefully keep up from last season. Perbix, Lilleberg and
Crozier will be fighting for 6-8 d positions.
 

BoltSTH

Registered User
Sep 4, 2008
2,426
787
Tampa
Paul - Point - Kucherov
Hagel - Cirelli - Guentzel
Eyssimont - Geekie - Atkinson
Girgensons - Glen - Chaffee

Hedman - Raddysh
McDonagh - Cernak
Moser - Perbix
Any lineup that does not have Sheary on it is off to a very good start. I would like to see Moser get a chance to play with Hedman, but Cooper would never let that happen.
 

OffBy1

Registered User
Aug 5, 2021
498
531
Paul - Point - Kucherov
Hagel - Cirelli - Guentzel
Eyssimont - Geekie - Atkinson
Girgensons - Glen - Chaffee

Hedman - Raddysh
McDonagh - Cernak
Moser - Perbix
The first two lines look great to me, but at the expense of the third line. I wouldn't expect that third line to be very effective at stopping other team's scoring lines.

I wouldn't get too excited about Atkinson after reading this review of his last year:

I'm going to assume he'll be an in and out of the lineup fourth liner at best.

I think the best thing that could happen for our forward group is if Geekie was actually capable of playing the 2C. Then we'd have similar to the above:

Paul - Point - Kucherov
Hagel - Geekie - Guentzel
Sheary - Cirelli - Eyssimont
Gigensons - Glendenning - Chaffee
Atkinson

I think this would be better because Hagel and Guenztel as wings should help should compensate for a rookie center, and Cirelli is a great third line center (ideally Sheary is replaced with an effective third line winger from the farm).

It seems like the earliest this fantasy of mine could happen is the 2nd half of the season, assuming Geekie does great in the preseason to win a spot on the third line and forces his way up to the 2nd by playing well the first half. I can dream about it anyway until the preseason comes and goes and he's not even on the team.
 

DistantThunderRep

Registered User
Mar 8, 2018
20,335
17,434
Hagel - Point - Kuch
Sheary - Cirelli - Guentzel
Atkinson - Paul - Essyimont
Girgenson - Glendenning - Chaffee

Hedman - Raddysh
McDonagh - Perbix
Moser - Cernak

Vasy

At the beginning of the season, we have to see if Guentzel can drag the lifeless corpse of Sheary back to 15g -30p guy he normally was. Also maybe he can get Cirelli to be that 20g - 50p 2C again but not take the whole season to get there. Sheary can only play his way down the line up this season to a buy out or trade. He's not touching the first line, start him on the second, give him every opportunity to sink or swim.

Not having Cernak eat more minutes and get injured for 1/4 to half the season is a must. Less minutes with Moser and split the shut down lines with both McDonagh and Cernak on separate lines. Moser has an offensive touch, so it still adds some possible finish for the 3rd paring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA

Hockeyville USA

Registered User
Dec 30, 2023
3,204
2,912
Central Ohio
Hagel - Point - Kuch
Sheary - Cirelli - Guentzel
Atkinson - Paul - Essyimont
Girgenson - Glendenning - Chaffee

Hedman - Raddysh
McDonagh - Perbix
Moser - Cernak

Vasy

At the beginning of the season, we have to see if Guentzel can drag the lifeless corpse of Sheary back to 15g -30p guy he normally was. Also maybe he can get Cirelli to be that 20g - 50p 2C again but not take the whole season to get there. Sheary can only play his way down the line up this season to a buy out or trade. He's not touching the first line, start him on the second, give him every opportunity to sink or swim.

Not having Cernak eat more minutes and get injured for 1/4 to half the season is a must. Less minutes with Moser and split the shut down lines with both McDonagh and Cernak on separate lines. Moser has an offensive touch, so it still adds some possible finish for the 3rd paring.
The D pairings look good other than Perbix. Just not a fan of his game after what I saw all of last year. Since we're not in the dressing room, hard to know if the coaches are oblivious to his weaknesses or if they're well aware, and Perbix just doesn't listen or is inept due to his skating/hockey IQ issues.
 

DistantThunderRep

Registered User
Mar 8, 2018
20,335
17,434
The D pairings look good other than Perbix. Just not a fan of his game after what I saw all of last year. Since we're not in the dressing room, hard to know if the coaches are oblivious to his weaknesses or if they're well aware, and Perbix just doesn't listen or is inept due to his skating/hockey IQ issues.
The hope is McDonagh is his teacher. Honestly there is no better teacher for young defensemen on the Team. McDonagh isn't a world breaker, he was always smart, read the game and the flow well. I think Perbix is the perfect person to pass that on someone like Perbix, Lilleberg, or Crozier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Outl4w

Hockeyville USA

Registered User
Dec 30, 2023
3,204
2,912
Central Ohio
I keep forgetting that we have Geekie. This offseason has been too long. Would be interesting to see him getting a shot in the middle 6 to start the season, and then down to the Crunch if he isn't ready. Goncalves will certainly be up, as he isn't waivers exempt anymore.
 

Stammertime91

TBL: TEAM OF THE CENTURY
Dec 13, 2011
14,144
13,209
Tampa: NHL's Newest Dynasty
The D pairings look good other than Perbix. Just not a fan of his game after what I saw all of last year. Since we're not in the dressing room, hard to know if the coaches are oblivious to his weaknesses or if they're well aware, and Perbix just doesn't listen or is inept due to his skating/hockey IQ issues.
The positive is that he can't get much worse without being replaced. Crozier showed he can step in. Whether he struggles as well is another case, but at least there's a few options. I hope Perbix gets it together, but watching those zone exits and passes with little to no pressure haunts me. Fortunately, that's a mental aspect that can be ironed out.
 

Hockeyville USA

Registered User
Dec 30, 2023
3,204
2,912
Central Ohio
The positive is that he can't get much worse without being replaced. Crozier showed he can step in. Whether he struggles as well is another case, but at least there's a few options. I hope Perbix gets it together, but watching those zone exits and passes with little to no pressure haunts me. Fortunately, that's a mental aspect that can be ironed out.
Hopefully Cooper has the balls to scratch him or tell BriseBois to get him off the roster if he plays like shit again.

I just hate Perbix because of his skating and lack of hockey IQ with the puck that we saw this past season
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stammertime91

These Are The Days

Oh no! We suck again!!
May 17, 2014
34,996
21,043
Tampa Bay
A lot of Perbix's worst play came with Sergachev. I'm not trying to kick the dude after putting in so many years of service to us. I'm trying to say that there's a reason he is no longer with us. Sergachev was a death sentence for anyone who wasn’t a bonafide top 4 D who knew exactly what he was doing at all times
 

NatoGhost

Registered User
Jun 27, 2013
690
369
The D pairings look good other than Perbix. Just not a fan of his game after what I saw all of last year. Since we're not in the dressing room, hard to know if the coaches are oblivious to his weaknesses or if they're well aware, and Perbix just doesn't listen or is inept due to his skating/hockey IQ issues.


I'll buy it and hope for a good year. He didn't seem great last year, but not as bad as fans make out to me.
 

Crunchrulz

Registered User
Apr 30, 2010
1,780
624
USA

I'll buy it and hope for a good year. He didn't seem great last year, but not as bad as fans make out to me.
In a world of numbers, fans can forget the value of the players who do not put them up, but instead enable more talented teammates to score points while they keep an eye on their own end of the ice and primary responsibilities that fall within their talent level.
 

Sky04

Registered User
Jan 8, 2009
29,504
18,788

Perbix is fine and one of our better value contracts, honestly sounds dumb criticizing him unsubstantiated. His play picked up significantly towards the end of the season, he was playing over 19mins a night at 1M.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLP55

Stammertime91

TBL: TEAM OF THE CENTURY
Dec 13, 2011
14,144
13,209
Tampa: NHL's Newest Dynasty

I'll buy it and hope for a good year. He didn't seem great last year, but not as bad as fans make out to me.
His play against the Panthers was a defensive dumpster fire. Constantly slapping the puck around and giving it up to avoid being hit. IIRC he was injured? Still, he had a sophomore season to forget. He can't really get much worse without being replaced by someone cheaper like Crozier. We don't need a world beater #6 but if he could rebound and settle somewhere in the middle of what we've seen, it'll be better than this last season. Playoffs were brutal. Him and Dumba turning the puck over relentlessly had me fuming.
 

RLP55

Registered User
Jul 13, 2022
27
25
I’m with S91.

I like Chaffee and Eyssimont. Just even incremental growth in their games, the the bottom six is in better shape. We disagree on Perbix. His problem, in particular against the panthers was too much ice time. Need to keep him around 14-15 TOI. Dude was +8 on a hot mess defense.

Willing to give Atkinson a shot. But Sheary and Glendening need to go. Understand the the forum's ‘displeasure’ with Sheary. All valid. But Glendening struck me as useless, at any price.

Need younger and more productivity. As stated above Chaffee and Essyimont are a good start. The little I saw of Geekie in 3v3, he’s not ready.

My secret crush ( no pun intended ) Actually got 2, Groshev and Huutahnen.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad