Alberta_OReilly_Fan
Bruin fan since 1975
if A is blow me away
B is play better than expected
C is meet expectations
D is below expectations
F is fail
marchand was an A. my expectations were high but wow
pastranak was an A. i wonder if he still has room to improve
Carlo was an A. he tailed off but i never even expected him on the team
Mcavoy was an A. limited showing of course
chara was a B. good healthy season
killer was a B. only disappoints when put in impossible positions
bergeron was a C... actually had a hell of a second half
rask was a C... team struggle in front of him
khubodin was a C... didnt look pretty but had results
krug was a C... impressive offense over last 2/3 of the year
mcquaid was a C... clearly gives us what he got
Moore was a C... has some good moments
backes was a C... wasnt his healthies season but he tries hard
schaller was a C... didnt expect nothing... got a decent 4th liner
acciari was a C... i will have to learn to spell his name
chiller was a C... raw tools but still shakey
blidh was a C... ready for spot duty
chelerk was a C... has good instincts
kurley was a C... gives me every reason to believe he can be a regular
Stafford was a C... thought he might provide some offense and he kind of did
Nash was a D... hoped for better offense from him especially when he was playing 3rd line
Liles was a D... my expectation are so low was easy to meet... somehow he still fell a bit short
czarik was a D... might have a future but his present was almost invisible
krejci was a D...in a season we needed more leadership it felt like he gave us none
morrow was a D... couldnt get coaches trust even though to my eye test he seamed passable
spooner was a D... just doesnt fit... and sometimes I don't feel he cares
Vatrano was a D... with that shot, i want him to succeed but he is one dimensional and needs to score more to get by
belesky was an F... i like him and hope he rebounds
Hayes was an F... i don't like him and hope hes moved
29 guys graded with only 6 having better than average seasons... explains why we were a middle of the pack team.
but average years get us to the playoffs... so shows our core is a decent core. there is room to see improvement
expected we would be a bubble team... that we would work hard... that some kids would get a chance...
overall got what i expected
team gets a c+
B is play better than expected
C is meet expectations
D is below expectations
F is fail
marchand was an A. my expectations were high but wow
pastranak was an A. i wonder if he still has room to improve
Carlo was an A. he tailed off but i never even expected him on the team
Mcavoy was an A. limited showing of course
chara was a B. good healthy season
killer was a B. only disappoints when put in impossible positions
bergeron was a C... actually had a hell of a second half
rask was a C... team struggle in front of him
khubodin was a C... didnt look pretty but had results
krug was a C... impressive offense over last 2/3 of the year
mcquaid was a C... clearly gives us what he got
Moore was a C... has some good moments
backes was a C... wasnt his healthies season but he tries hard
schaller was a C... didnt expect nothing... got a decent 4th liner
acciari was a C... i will have to learn to spell his name
chiller was a C... raw tools but still shakey
blidh was a C... ready for spot duty
chelerk was a C... has good instincts
kurley was a C... gives me every reason to believe he can be a regular
Stafford was a C... thought he might provide some offense and he kind of did
Nash was a D... hoped for better offense from him especially when he was playing 3rd line
Liles was a D... my expectation are so low was easy to meet... somehow he still fell a bit short
czarik was a D... might have a future but his present was almost invisible
krejci was a D...in a season we needed more leadership it felt like he gave us none
morrow was a D... couldnt get coaches trust even though to my eye test he seamed passable
spooner was a D... just doesnt fit... and sometimes I don't feel he cares
Vatrano was a D... with that shot, i want him to succeed but he is one dimensional and needs to score more to get by
belesky was an F... i like him and hope he rebounds
Hayes was an F... i don't like him and hope hes moved
29 guys graded with only 6 having better than average seasons... explains why we were a middle of the pack team.
but average years get us to the playoffs... so shows our core is a decent core. there is room to see improvement
expected we would be a bubble team... that we would work hard... that some kids would get a chance...
overall got what i expected
team gets a c+
Last edited: