He has a NMC, so what's in it for Filpula to make him waive? Right, nothing.
1. Eklund is a joke, he is batting about 1% in the past 5 years. (that might be generous) I refuse to click on any links to his site which keeps his blogs a reality.
2. Yakupov has not proven himself to be worth much, but that doesn't mean I (and many Other Oiler fans) think the Oilers should trade him. Personally, I would rather take the risk on his potential upside and lose him for nothing, rather than lose him for every offer I have seen from other teams posters this past year. Laugh about potential, but burying him on the 3rd and 4th lines with a bunch of plugs like Lander and Letestu does not usually bode well for a young, confidence-fragile, offensive minded player... am I right Canadien fans?
3. The Oilers are surely not trading for Filppula, a negative asset. (a) he has a NMC, meaning he has to agree to the trade first and he MUST be protected in the upcoming Expansion draft (contrary to some peopke's understanding of a NMC, if he waives to go to a team of his liking the clause is still in effect), (b) NMC aside, he is no longer worth anywhere near his contract commitment ($5M per for this and next season). Who cares if he waives, don't want any part of that anchor of a contract.
I say keep Yak and play him in the top 6 for half a season... if he continues to suck then you keep him as an exposed RFA for the Expansion Draft or let him walk on July 1 for nothing.