Proposal: Would you trade Kyrou for Dobson

[Spektre]

Yes or no? Why or why not?

Click to read more...

 

[Bye Bye Blueston]

Would depend on his contract ask.

 

[Linkens Mastery]

No, Dobson screams "all offense no defense" this fan base will turn on him in 3 years. Especially if he gets paid 9.5+mil a year.

 

[Snubbed4Vezina]

No. Kyrou is going to be a much better value for his contract than Dobson will be on his new deal.

Kyrou at his AAV is going to be prime real estate in a season or two.

Better yet, let's just keep our best offensive player this season when we already suck on offense.

 

[Blanick]

Robbing Peter to pay Paul. Dobson will probably ask for 2-3mil more than what Kyrou is locked in at for 7 more years. I wouldn't mind trading for Dobson but we need to add more offense and you don't do that by trading your best offensive piece.

 

[Majorityof1]

Robbing Peter to pay Paul. Dobson will probably ask for 2-3mil more than what Kyrou is locked in at for 7 more years. I wouldn't mind trading for Dobson but we need to add more offense and you don't do that by trading your best offensive piece.

 

[bleedblue1223]

In theory yes, but it's 100% on Dobson's contract ask.

 

[TheDizee]

id trade him for a bag of cheetos

 

[Blanick]

id trade him for a bag of cheetos

Well then its a good thing nobody cares what you think.

 

[BleedBlue14]

Yes assuming he will sign an 8 year extension and it isn't completely unreasonable.

I would prefer not to trade Kyrou in a Dobson deal and deal futures but if it's what it would take then yes.

 

[LetsGoBooze]

To start the year absolutely. Now, i would pass. Kyrou has shown he can make any line he's on better and has had better 2 way play. His contract will be a bargain starting next year, once Marner and Rat sign somewhere in the offseason. Dobson, while great offensively isnt elite in his own end, i think we could find a PP QB without giving away our current top offensive piece.