SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 16,056
- 15,663
I would, I think it would be the best. Not sure if my heart can take it though. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0c2e/e0c2e4b0ba5d5087c1dd1b301e96724f025a372c" alt="Relieved face :relieved: 😌"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0c2e/e0c2e4b0ba5d5087c1dd1b301e96724f025a372c" alt="Relieved face :relieved: 😌"
What if you like hockey but want to see a best of 5?After what we saw between them at the 4 nations if you vote no you don't like hockey
Best of 6 with goal differential being the tie breaker.What if you like hockey but want to see a best of 5?
Stole the words right outta my mouth. The entertainment factor would be off the charts. but logistically you could only do this in the offseason if it was strictly a series between these 2 and not a tournament between the other nations too. And yeah, the risk of injury would be high for how heated this would get.I voted yes - because I would LOVE to see it.
Logically speaking though - it'll never happen. For a lot of reasons:
1. What about the other countries?
2. When, during season? Too disruptive
3. Risk of injury would be huge
etc
Or you can not associate hockey with politics and just enjoy the game?Honestly in the current political climate I kind of wouldn't. Would love to see the hockey but too much other geopolitical stuff going on. We can wait and have this series later.
FWIW, as an American I'm glad Canada won
Then you're not an American.FWIW, as an American I'm glad Canada won
Or you can not associate hockey with politics and just enjoy the game?
This site needs a downvote for posts like this
It was a bit difficult to expect millions of people on both sides of the border to not bring politics into it based on what was going on.Or you can not associate hockey with politics and just enjoy the game?
This site needs a downvote for posts like this