- Aug 13, 2007
- 36,182
- 17,307
Would you give Stamkos away?
- Thread starter PredsV82
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Do I count? Because as frustrating as he's been at times, that would only be making the situation worse IMO.
Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 16,547
- 13,419
Y'all can't win. Because if this poll proves ME wrong, I'll be the one forced to believe you are stupid.
I don't think we really have to worry about it, though, because there are ZERO NHL teams who would take Stamkos off our hands for free. And if you are self-admittedly even dumber than an NHL GM... that's pretty sad for you.
- Aug 13, 2007
- 36,182
- 17,307
Of course you count, step sis.
Ah yes making a categorically unverifiable claim as if it's fact to support your opinion. Solid.Y'all can't win. Because if this poll proves ME wrong, I'll be the one forced to believe you are stupid.
I don't think we really have to worry about it, though, because there are ZERO NHL teams who would take Stamkos off our hands for free. And if you are self-admittedly even dumber than an NHL GM... that's pretty sad for you.
Last edited:
Voted yes - in a vacuum, video game sort of scenario, he has negative value and I'd trade him for a 7th.
In reality, to @Viqsi's point, you can only do this if he wants to and the off-ice impacts might outweigh the benefits. It just depends on what is happening behind the scenes.
The rising cap is going to help with the contract, bad as it is.
In reality, to @Viqsi's point, you can only do this if he wants to and the off-ice impacts might outweigh the benefits. It just depends on what is happening behind the scenes.
The rising cap is going to help with the contract, bad as it is.
Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 16,547
- 13,419
- Aug 13, 2007
- 36,182
- 17,307
Knock yourself out...I want the Saros and Skjei polls next please.
Bringer of Jollity
Registered User
f*** no. Signing him to that bloated NMC contract helped lock us into a specific direction that has prevented rebuilding flexibility and eaten roster spots that caused young players and prospects to be jettisoned for nothing. He doesn't get to freely walk away into a better situation after half a season with nothing else to show for it (and us probably having to eat half his salary for 3 more years).
And I'm someone that doesn't even really want the guy on the team.
And I'm someone that doesn't even really want the guy on the team.
BigFatCat999
First Fubu and now Pred303. !@#$! you cancer
I think you’re an impatient, arrogant child.Y'all can't win. Because if this poll proves ME wrong, I'll be the one forced to believe you are stupid.
I don't think we really have to worry about it, though, because there are ZERO NHL teams who would take Stamkos off our hands for free. And if you are self-admittedly even dumber than an NHL GM... that's pretty sad for you.
No, I would not give away Stampe code because I’m a sacrifice this year to have a really damn good year next year
Armourboy
Hey! We suck!
If I thought Trotz would do a proper rebuild instead of just burning that cap on a guy that's basically the same I would. Frankly if you get rid of Brunette he might not be that bad.
- Aug 13, 2007
- 36,182
- 17,307
He's not "that bad" now. He took longer than expected to get going, largely because Brunette is such dumb f***.
Roman Yoshi
#164303
I'll say it: I'd give up Skjei for nothing.I want the Saros and Skjei polls next please.
I wouldn't give up Stamkos for nothing, but I'd eat half of his deal to trade him to tampa for their next two first round picks.
Armourboy
Hey! We suck!
Eh I'm convinced Skjei is just another victim of a stupid Defensive system by the head coach. He hasn't been great but I'm not sure anyone could be in this garbage.
You don't pay guys 8 million a season to be " not that bad ". If he was making 4.5 -5 it would be different.
