TheTotalPackage
Registered User
- Sep 14, 2006
- 7,619
- 5,966
The league sure knows how to suck the fun right out with these cheesy incidental contact with the goalie calls and the ridiculous offside rule.
It looks like McDavid's foot hits the goaltender and moves him, but there is also enough time to reset so I'm not sure the contact was enough to hinder positioning. Then again, without the contact would his positioning have been better?
I don't think it's the worst goaltender interference call of the season, much less in history. It's a tough way to end up losing a goal, though.
How did you come to the conclusion that the goalie had enough "time to reset"? He gets pulled to one side and a second later the puck comes in from the other side. Contact clearly happens deep in the crease. I thought it was a bad call when I saw it live but after watching the replay a few times I can totally understand why the decision was changed.
Ask Leaf fans if a high stick on Gilmour still pisses them off.Jesus christ, move on already. Every time I see a goalie interference thread, Oiler fans continually reference this stupid play in the Ducks series. You guys lost, it's done, move on. Stop living in the past.
Yea, there's just no way you can call that a no-goal when last night, Andersen gets impeded with a stick to the head and sprawled upon.
The Matthews-Bernier goal called back, agreed
But not the Hawks-Tor goal last night, IMO.
By "reset" I mean he had some time to attempt to make a save after the contact, but the more I watch it the more I tend to agree that the contact was enough to substantially diminish his ability to get into a more desirable position and because of that the call was correct.
Tell us Bob, do you think Smith's save % went up or down on that play?You know what is worse than that call, fans chiming in, that it was a good call. This kind of stuff being disallowed is why a few years from now we will see only 2-1 games with 15 goalie interference goals turned away.
Hopefully at least they're going to talk about it. I know whatever they do can't be perfect but just take some of the uncertainty out of it to try and make it more consistent.
Laughable comparison... You show a still of the McDavid GI long after it happened?
If that's what had happened on the play, I agree it could've been a case of goaltender interference.I don't really see an issue with the call. Skated through the crease (on his own), clipped the goalie and twisted him away from where the puck was, and the puck goes in pretty shortly after.
Hardly worst of all time.