View attachment 1043666
Derrick Pouliot at #8 in 2012 was a bit of a surprise, especially with Filip Forsberg and Jacob Trouba still on the board.
Was it? I remember being a bit surprised, and the above rankings suggest he was being mocked more in the mid first round, but Pouliot was still the first overall pick into the WHL draft, had been considered a first rounder for a while, and his stock closed well with a deep playoff run. It was Koekoek that was more out of nowhere for the top ten that year, I think, given he missed most of the year.
Forsberg dropping that year remains one of the more baffling draft developments I can recall. His stock had slipped from the talk of him as a top three pick, but it wasn't a great draft and the only two forwards that went ahead of him were by no means perfect. Given how Washington quickly flipped him the next year, always wondered what more there might be to that story.
It's kinda amazing but Tim Burke has worked for the Sharks in some scouting capacity since the early 90's. Burke is based around Boston so it seemed like a safe bet that San Jose would take a New England area prospect or two every draft.
Morris (Massachusetts prep school) was a bit out of left field (Central had him #57 among North Americans) but not as high of expectations for a late 1st rounder in an average 2002 crop. Between Morris and their next pick at #52, the only future established NHLers were Jarret Stoll (draft reentry), Trevor Daley, and Matt Greene.
The Morris case speaks to why teams reach for raw tools late in the first, and why some of the most interest cases are always the prep kids that go in that range. For every guy like Morris or David Fisher, there is a Chris Kreider or Brock Nelson or Kevin Hayes. It's easy to dump on those picks when they fall flat, but there's a reason teams - once the board drops off in terms of talent - will go for higher risk players that have a carrying tool but untested against better competition. Mark Jankowski is actually an interesting example of where the outcome is not so all or nothing, as we often see picks like him - or Letourneau last year - portrayed as.
I think where that profile gets trickier is when the tools are less compelling. Patrick White, the Vancouver pick, is an interesting example. Played most of his draft year in high school, but did close with 8 goals in 12 USHL games (albeit a weaker league at the time), and then a solid stint joining the NTDP at the U18s. He was a 6'1" centre. That profile probably gets you into the late first conversation now, but there wasn't a great sample size for him as a first round talent against strong competition and he didn't have that carrying tool.