deandebean
Registered User
The Albino said:Not to mention the guys who aren't playing (Tanguay, Bertuzzi, Blake, Pronger). Canada was in a bit of a lull around Nagano, but everything goes in cycles. Like you said, even if Canada loses there won't be a big controversy about how Canada "can't compete anymore."
Canada HAD a problem in Nagano. The philosophy surrounding canadian hockey was, at the time: we have to play a physical, in-your-face type of hockey to be effective. Remember the composition of the team?
The Hockey Summit brought one good thing to the forefront: Canada CAN produce superior hockey players, but we have to insist even more on the skillset of players, not on their grit and size, which were Canadiana fixtures. Gretzky, at the time, said it on National TV. Bob Nicholson also. Since then, minor hockey has changed a bit, everywhere. The skills are better honed than they were. Our national program is the most complete of all the countries; no question about it, since we're the only country placing teams on podiums at most of all the international events. In minor hockey, the programs have been upgraded. The kids have "lessons" before or during the season, at practically every level except the latter ones. The Excellence program in this province (midget AAA, midget Espoir and Major Junior) has been super, nothing to say about it.
Canada could lose against a more experienced team saturday. But it is not a more talented team. Even if this is a young bunch (you take out Lemieux and, age-wise, it is the youngest, less experienced), it has an incredible lineup, fixtures we will see for the next 10 years or so. And to think we left a kid like Nash out of the picture! And imagine Crosby 3 years from now!
All I have to say is: chapeau! But let's not drop our guard, like we did in the mid 90's. Let's keep being the premier hockey nation in the world.
Last edited: