Vic Rattlehead*
Guest
I can't wait to quote this post tomorrow. No way will either team win by such a score. Only a child would predict this.Reilly311 said:a 5-0 romp by the US.
I can't wait to quote this post tomorrow. No way will either team win by such a score. Only a child would predict this.Reilly311 said:a 5-0 romp by the US.
19bruins19 said:I can't wait to quote this post tomorrow. No way will either team win by such a score. Only a child would predict this.
victoriacanucker said:5 - 2 Canada
Heatley (2) Richards , Sakic , Jovo
Amonte , Drury
H3ro said:Canada 5 - USA 1
Iginla (2) - Richards - Niedermayer - Gagné
Gomez
Komi#1 said:Lemieux-Sakic-Iginla
Smyth-Lecavalier-Heatley
Gagné-Richards-St-Louis
Marleau-Draper-Maltby
Morrow-Thornton-Doan
Redden-Jovanovski
Regehr-Niedermayer
Brewer-Foote
Bouwmeester-Hannan
19bruins19 said:Exactly, none of those were five goal differences.
nomorekids said:the point is...you can't single reilly out for predicting a blowout..when others are doing it to...just..the other way
Reilly311 said:WOW! People with brains DO exsist on this board!
19bruins19 said:I can't wait to quote this post tomorrow. No way will either team win by such a score. Only a child would predict this.
You know, you had me thinking you were talking about Sakic, I read that article thinking he was hurt or something.19bruins19 said:Since Joe might be sitting
BartG101 said:Reminds me of the criticism I received when I predicted Tampa would sweep the Habs...
Predictions are merely that, a child can be just as accurate as the most informed poster here.
If you think that's the case, you need to report it and let the mods make a decision about it. Griping about it in the thread and attacking other posters only gets the gripers and attackers in trouble.Canadian_man said:But what if those predictions are made soely for the purpose being hateful?
Canadian_man said:But what if those predictions are made soely for the purpose being hateful?
Proud Habber said:3-2, or maybe 4-2 Canada, with the fourth being an empty netter.
dw2927 said:Just for even-ness (if that's even a word)...
I think Canada will win fairly big, pulling away in the 3rd...If Modano and Tkachuk don't have it cranked up by now, I don't see who will be doing the scoring for the USA...i'll go with a 3-0 Canuck win.
I'd have to agree. I'm more impressed with the U.S. forwards than I thought I'd be (and that's saying a LOT, trust me). I was also happy with how Esche's performance the other night sounded, it'll be nice to actually see it and judge for myself, though.Rabid Ranger said:You don't know who will be doing the scoring? How about pick your poison? Scoring isn't the issue for the U.S.-it's whether the defense can hold and inexperienced goaltending.
Sotnos said:I'd have to agree. I'm more impressed with the U.S. forwards than I thought I'd be (and that's saying a LOT, trust me). I was also happy with how Esche's performance the other night sounded, it'll be nice to actually see it and judge for myself, though.