Just like we didn't see your whining coming.Nihilism said:US PP, wow I didn't see that coming.
Steveorama said:Hey, I know the Americans are the classy team that doesn't want to run up the score, but this is getting ridiculous.
3 goals = chili said:uh oh...PP for the US...2/10 on the PP today
Wild GM said:Guess that 2-person Sweden advantage was just a fluke, huh? If anything, they want the US to lose to show the world that everyone is catching up to the US and Canada.
Steveorama said:Can't believe CBC isn't showing this, choosing ski-jumping instead.
This game is a classic...are there that many ski-jump fans in Canada?
Steveorama said:Can't believe CBC isn't showing this, choosing ski-jumping instead.
This game is a classic...are there that many ski-jump fans in Canada?
Steveorama said:Can't believe CBC isn't showing this, choosing ski-jumping instead.
This game is a classic...are there that many ski-jump fans in Canada?
BigE said:To all of our Swedish members in this thread: does your country follow the women nearly as much as they do the men?
In other words how big of a win would this be?
Yes and when one team is outplaying another team significantly in hockey, they never wind up with a legitimate edge in PP opportunities as a result. Right?Nihilism said:Did you watch the game at all? Did you miss the 5on3 for like 3 minutes the Americans had?
22 PIM for Sweden
12 for the US
Steveorama said:Can't believe CBC isn't showing this, choosing ski-jumping instead.
This game is a classic...are there that many ski-jump fans in Canada?