97 group - Similar to this one in terms of quality.
96 group - Better.
95 group - Worse (Wallmark, Burakovsky, De la Rose and then there was nothing more)
94 group - Way better.
93 group - Similar.
97: The best forwards where/are, Eriksson Ek, Asplund, Grundström and Dahlen, pretty decent, but still a step behind Andersson, Nylander, Boqvist and Pettersson.
96: I would say it has deph, but lacks of top end talent after Nylander, even if Timashov is a intresting player.
95: Yes horrible year, nothing execpt for Burakovsky, but questionable if even he was as good at that time.
94: I would say fairly even. Probably give the edge to 98, some of the 94 delvoped nicely, but that can some 98 do to, you have to look at how good they where at that time, and then I give the edge to 98.
93: Who was as good as A Nylander in their draft year or was as good as Andersson, Boqvist and Pettersson the season before the draft?
I do not know how they will develop, a lot will happen both good and bad, but at this time this is a very good forward year.
Alex Nylander a top 10 pick in this draft
Andersson has PPG on 1,59 in superelit
Boqvist 1,53 in superelit
Pettersson has been overall good in allsvenskan with some up and downs, and finish with 0,8 PPG in the "playoff"
This can be compare with W Nylander that is the best forward prospect that has come in recent years, had a PPG on 1,59 in lesser games. His stats from WJC the season before his draft is also not as good as Pettersson and Andersson. The stats maybe lie a bit, but this is a good year.