Bob P
Registered User
- Sep 4, 2021
- 28
- 8
So you admit the refs cheated. HilariousChill. Canada has cheated with the refs many times. Dont throw rocks in a glass house.
So you admit the refs cheated. HilariousChill. Canada has cheated with the refs many times. Dont throw rocks in a glass house.
your on home ice.. you are equal favorites to usa and above finland and cze.. i am tired of your nonsense you play the sweden is trash sweden sucks card so you can disappear when you lose.. but when you win ye run your mouth.. the act is old dude.In what planet is sweden bigger favorites than USA, Finns and Czehcs?
In what planet is sweden bigger favorites than USA, Finns and Czehcs?
I guess you don’t get many best days when the Canadians are playing.This is the best day of my life, first canada goes out early and then salty canadians in here throws a hissy fit.
NA na na na
Not the smartest of plays but it's usually not a penalty in OT. The refs just let very similar plays go twice on the Muller play. If those two aren't penalties, neither is the Dionicio one. You need to have a line as a ref.
I do fault Dionicio for the lazy delay of game he took but the one in OT I think was calculated risk after all the previous non calls.
Tsn showed the replay and his heels were in the crease.
See you in next tournament!I guess you don’t get many best days when the Canadians are playing.
home ice is is not giving us any super powersyour on home ice.. you are equal favorites to usa and above finland and cze.. i am tired of your nonsense you play the sweden is trash sweden sucks card so you can disappear when you lose.. but when you win ye run your mouth.. the act is old dude.
Definitely a strange and a bit bitter ending of the game even for me as a neutral spectator. Such thriller games shouldn't be decided by controversial penalty calls.
It wasnt illegal. According to rulebook you can be in crease as long as you dont touch the goalie. Which he didnt.And? That alone doesn't make it an illegal goal...
It's doesn't? Found this in the IIHF rules. It could be wrong but...And? That alone doesn't make it an illegal goal...
Wrong!It wasnt illegal. According to rulebook you can be in crease as long as you dont touch the goalie. Which he didnt.
Was Edstrom really in the crease? I saw the replay and if he's in the crease it's like 1 milimeter hahaIt's doesn't? Found this in the IIHF rules. It could be wrong but...
Goal Crease Area: Unless the puck is in the goal crease area, a player of the attacking team may not stand in the goal crease. If the puck should enter the net while such conditions prevail, the goal will NOT BE ALLOWED.
NAh the canadians must have something else to complain about. Thats a good goal 10/10Was Edstrom really in the crease? I saw the replay and if he's in the crease it's like 1 milimeter haha
Yes he was. I don't like the rule so please don't think it's sonething I support. But, his heels were 100% in the crease. Doesn't matter if it's a millimeter or a foot. Either you're in or out....he was in.Was Edstrom really in the crease? I saw the replay and if he's in the crease it's like 1 milimeter haha
Inconclusive and the goalie wasnt disturbed. It is called a good goal 10/10 in todays hockey, But keep thinking that it will get called back.Yes he was. I don't like the rule so please don't think it's sonething I support. But, his heels were 100% in the crease. Doesn't matter if it's a millimeter or a foot. Either you're in or out....he was in.
Your performance in every match thread has been a disgrace if anything. Just moaning about everything.Canadians have no reason to care except it was an absolute disgrace to hockey.
yeah especially he comes with crazy conspiracy theories that Sweden have bought the refs in every tournament, the guy lives 0n Mars and thinks the earth is flatYour performance in every match thread has been a disgrace if anything. Just moaning about everything.
Like I said I do not agree with it. To me he did not interfere with the goalie. But...the rule I found states Unless the puck is in the goal crease area, a player of the attacking team may not stand in the goal crease. If the puck should enter the net while such conditions prevail, the goal will NOT BE ALLOWED.Inconclusive and the goalie wasnt disturbed. It is called a good goal 10/10 in todays hockey, But keep thinking that it will get called back.
We have no plans to stop buying the refs, get ready for another undeserved win.yea yea try not to choke in the medal round like usual there bud.
We have no plans to stop buying the refs, get ready for another undeserved win.