Our prospects in the tourney:
Sweden: Lindholm, Rakell, Karlsson
USA: Gibson
Sweden: Lindholm, Rakell, Karlsson
USA: Gibson
He barely played, so it's not surprising.Rakell and Karlsson looked great in the 1st period. Lindholm didn't stand out good or bad. All round solid/quiet so far.
That's what SP and I were saying. This guy is one of the prospects in our pool that I'm the most confident will make it. He isn't even getting much time on the PK - one of his strengths.Rakell is a player that is better than stats indicate
Every time I see him i completely disregard his OHL stats, he just always seems like one of the best players out thereThat's what SP and I were saying. This guy is one of the prospects in our pool that I'm the most confident will make it. He isn't even getting much time on the PK - one of his strengths.
It's an exhibition. He's their number 1 defenseman. It would have been the same story for the US if Jones had played. These games are to decide who gets cut, so the lower guys get more ice time.Lindholm playing only 2nd pair minutes?
It's an exhibition. He's their number 1 defenseman. It would have been the same story for the US if Jones had played. These games are to decide who gets cut, so the lower guys get more ice time.
We'll gladly keep him/them, I guess.Can we please have your swedish scout?
I thought Rakell was Sweden's best player, but Forsberg was on the same level. He was great all game.that`s what i thought (hoped), but had to get confirmation to feel better
Thanks.
Did Rakell and Karlsson were good all the game?
Forsberg a captain?
Rakell is a player that is better than stats indicate
I've always touted Rakell as one of our top prospects. I'm confident he'll shine in WJC.
Fun game to watch so far.
Rakell looks very impressive. I hope we stick with the Swedish drafting philosophy, that de la Rose kid is very skilled and shifty and one other guy really stuck out to me, but I couldn't fully understand what the announcer was calling him. I think it was Wennberg, but Im not sure.
Well, this season he seems to have been judged primarily on his offensive numbers in the Juniors, and I have to admit, I didn't really like that at all. Based on the little I've seen of him, Rakell struck me as a player who is so much more than his stats. He seemed to have a complete game, with the type of intangibles that can make GM's salivate. The kind of player you need to see to appreciate what he can do for your team.
I just felt like it was a disservice to him to look at the stat sheet and determine that he needed to be better. With some players, I think that might be applicable, but to me Rakell is playing a professional game at the Junior level, and numbers just don't tell you that.