Winter Olympics 2026 in Milano and Cortina

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Well I thought it was obvious the poster was referring to overall winter sports interest, not hockey but I guess that's just me.
Who cares? There's hockey beyond the NHL. If the Canadians aren't interested in the sport beyond one league that's their shame and doesn't really compare very well even to Italy.
Actually the references to "the NHL" and "the sport" (singular) makes it obvious the poster is talking about just hockey and not overall winter sports interest




Yes because that's exactly the point in talking about adult teams vs junior teams...
Nope, we're talking about Olympics which is for adults.
On the other hand you actually did say Olympics and therefore weren't specifically talking about hockey (you should have referenced a hockey league and then said used "the sport" like Albatross did!)




Not sure why you'd post a pic of all these people responding to you and how wrong you've repeatedly been :sarcasm:
tenor.gif
 
To recap:

- Canadians only care about the NHL
Ok, What about the World Cup?
- That doesn't count. Cause it's basically NHL.
Alright, how about the IHWC, World Juniors, AHL, CHL?
- No we're only talking about the Olympics here!
?? Uhm, ok. So how about the last Olympics then? When nearly 3 million Canadians watched a bunch of "nobodies" skate around playing for bronze?
- That doesn't count either because Italy doesn't play in the Final.

HUH? What's the point any more?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riddum
To recap:

- Canadians only care about the NHL
Ok, What about the World Cup?
- That doesn't count. Cause it's basically NHL.
Alright, how about the IHWC, World Juniors, AHL, CHL?
- No we're only talking about the Olympics here!
?? Uhm, ok. So how about the last Olympics then? When nearly 3 million Canadians watched a bunch of "nobodies" skate around playing for bronze?
- That doesn't count either because Italy doesn't play in the Final.

HUH? What's the point any more?

The's no point in anything anymore.
 
The reason why Finland will never host the winter-Olympics is that we don't have proper hills, which is a blessing; stops us from wasting a lot of money for nonsense such as the olympics.

I guess its downhill and super G thats is the main problem?
 
The reason why Finland will never host the winter-Olympics is that we don't have proper hills, which is a blessing; stops us from wasting a lot of money for nonsense such as the olympics.

The only way to do it would be in co-operation with maybe Sweden and Åre. I think that's the plan they're going for. The actual problem is the lack of a proper sled track. Not sure if Lillehammer still has one. Probably not because Stockholm's bid had Latvia in it due to them having one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ippenator
In 2030 it will certainly be in North-America again but maybe in 2034 it is Sweden hosting.
 
In 2030 it will certainly be in North-America again but maybe in 2034 it is Sweden hosting.

Highly doubtfull.

Well 2034 is a long way ahead, so who knows what the lay of the land is.

But.

Sweden has already failed this like 6 times, and if its going to be worth to try again, Sweden need to show up something extra, with new arenas, large budget and a full guarantee of financial backup from the Swedish taxpayers, and all around cooperate with everything IOC wants. That needs to be in place, and knowing how things work, the Swedish public opinion against will be too large.

Maybe Norway?
 
Last edited:
I don't blame the public opinion for being against bidding for the olympics but unfortunately they don't get asked.
 
I don't blame the public opinion for being against bidding for the olympics but unfortunately they don't get asked.

Its typical for Swedish opinion to always be split in half in everything.

But yeah, the Swedish olympic commitee tried to ease the public opinion with a low budget, it kind of worked since they got at least the goverment on thier side, but to the expense of having a bit too spread out olympic bid, and a bit too lose financial guarantees (at least from ioc's point of view, there is different opinions on that).
 
You could say that the summer-Olympics should always be in Athens because that is where the Olympics belong. How could the Greek afford to host it every time? I have no idea.

However, as for the winter-Olympics, there is no place where it "belongs".
 
I lived in Milan for the first 25 years of my life. I can guarantee you that in february the torrid temperatures are a big problem, fortunately the ATM (public transport company) now sold all the trams to S.Francisco and switches to dromedaries, now we can make our way out of the sandstorms with ease.
Anyways, in Milan only the opening and closing ceremonies will take place (in S.Siro stadium) and the ice sports. The rest is spread over three different regions, on structures that already largely exists.
I am not a big fan of having the olympics at home, for various reasons, but at least is s very very budged candidature. Milan still needs a proper ice rink, the Agorà is horrible and the Forum not really functional. Hopefully a new arena will bring back part of those 10000 spectators that the Saima had in the nineties. The village will be build in a very central, yet mostly abandoned, area. Worst case scenario will turn in the umpteenth block of unnecessary luxury housing and offices buildings. The rest is pretty much already there and will just need to be brushed up.
Oh, who says that northern Italy does not have a winter sport culture really does not know what he is talking about.

That said, when the games will be done, they'll leave behind a town with brand new shiny toys, much more gentrified, more expensive, less diverse and less livable for all the people that are not rich enough to cope with the new status.
I hope I will be mistaken with this, but the Expo is new enough to work as a good example of what can happen.
 
Sweden host 0 times, 158 winter games medals.

Italy host 3 times, 124 winter games medals.

Yea, traditon is important to the IOC.

Lolololol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyfrilla
It's a country with 30+ celsius / 86+ Fahrenheit degrees in winter which means their "fake snow" will melt in seconds and the ice quality will be awful for any event involving skating

not sure where you're getting your info from since it definitely doesn't look like Milan and Cortina get 30 degree winter weather
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jussi and adsfan
not sure where you're getting your info from since it definitely doesn't look like Milan and Cortina get 30 degree winter weather

I have to agree. I believe that Cortina hosted the 1956 Winter Olympics. Zambonis existed but I don't know if artificial snow guns had been invented.

Cortina managed to pull it off somehow despite that "tropical weather" that Zeb has posted about.
 
Sweden host 0 times, 158 winter games medals.

Italy host 3 times, 124 winter games medals.

Yea, traditon is important to the IOC.

Lolololol.

Having venues for all the disciplines seems to be most important. Sweden does not have a track for sled events. You do understand that? Lillehammer had a track in '94. Build one, then you might get the games. Organizing them in Latvia was a simple no-go when the other candidate has them all in the same country.
 
I have to agree. I believe that Cortina hosted the 1956 Winter Olympics. Zambonis existed but I don't know if artificial snow guns had been invented.

Cortina managed to pull it off somehow despite that "tropical weather" that Zeb has posted about.

1956 Olympic weather:

original.jpg
 
^^^If you don't think "tropical" when you look at that picture, I don't know what to tell you. Is that Italy, or is that Hawai'i prior to a big-wave surfing competition? (end sarcasm)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad