Crunchy
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2020
- 133
- 297
That list is not even a full 2 years out, so it's hard to use to support an argument regarding NHL outcomes... And I'm not sure it even looks like it would support it at this point regardless. Just a glance shows an extreme disparity in the defenseman rankings and it's big forward takes appear to be that Perrault/Musty/Cristall > Leonard/Benson/Wood. Color me skeptical.Not saying junior success = NHL success. Just saying that lack of junior success very often does = lack of NHL success. Obviously other things matter. But lack of production isn't irrelevant to future success, it's the one thing that's the most relevant.
Here's a 2023 ranking based entirely on stats. 2 years later, this is pretty close to how all of these guys have performed in higher leagues. And it's not a crazy different draft than what actually went down.![]()
A Data-driven look at the top 250 prospects in the 2023 NHL Draft
Here is a data-driven look at how the top 250 prospects stack up for the upcoming NHL Entry Draft.soundofhockey.com
Of course scoring goals and helping to generate goals is important in prospect evaluation, but it's only a part of the eval. Isolating it is not superior to the holistic evaluation performed by NHL scouts and organizations.
Not only that but the value a player brings cannot be solely measured in points. Gustav Nyquist outscored Brady Tkachuk, Ryan O'Reilly, and Anze Kopitar last year, yet he holds nowhere close the value of these players. Hockey statistics are deeply flawed because much of what impacts winning is extremely difficult to quantify. Goals and points are easy to measure and therefore it is easy for them to be overrepresented. Especially in hockey, qualitative assessment remains vital particularly in the GA category, which heavily impacts winning.