Flowah
Registered User
- Nov 30, 2009
- 10,249
- 547
Good point.That was definitely the case with Holland but sure if that’s going to be the case with Stevie. This will be a good test.
Good point.That was definitely the case with Holland but sure if that’s going to be the case with Stevie. This will be a good test.
I mean we only really have her and Khan, and I've always thought that he is more willing to criticize the team. They're both definitely team mouthpieces and worth listening to just to get whatever the organization wants to give. Perhaps she gets more hate because she's a woman, but honestly I think it's because she used to be too Team Holland. I remember HSJ being particularly willing to tow the party line. I hope that's not just my perception due to unconscious sexism, and I should dislike Khan just as much, but I guess it's hard to know for sure. Either way if I was convinced it was sexism, I don't think it would make me like HSJ more; I'd just make things equitable by moving Khan from "useless beat writer" to "what do you even do all day?" status with her.Exactly. Imagine she publishes this article and then next year she's in the locker room trying to interview Abby and Blashill. Awkward. And players don't like when reports throw their coach and teammates under the bus for clicks. They'll remember that and the relationships are damaged. As much as we all want an unfiltered look into the Wings, that's not how these working relationships are formed. It's symbiotic. The reporters get access to the team and the team gets to control the tone of the narrative. This is entertainment. Sports are entertainment.
And I love how she gets criticized for being a shill when she reported on the Cleary situation but when she reports this stuff, now she's making up clickbait. I also wonder why HSJ gets so much more hate than the other beat writers. As far as I can tell, after years of reading our beat reporters content, she's nearly identical to the rest. They all have the same talking points and tepid criticism. If only I could pinpoint one thing that was different about her.
Exactly. Imagine she publishes this article and then next year she's in the locker room trying to interview Abby and Blashill. Awkward. And players don't like when reports throw their coach and teammates under the bus for clicks. They'll remember that and the relationships are damaged. As much as we all want an unfiltered look into the Wings, that's not how these working relationships are formed. It's symbiotic. The reporters get access to the team and the team gets to control the tone of the narrative. This is entertainment. Sports are entertainment.
And I love how she gets criticized for being a shill when she reported on the Cleary situation but when she reports this stuff, now she's making up clickbait. I also wonder why HSJ gets so much more hate than the other beat writers. As far as I can tell, after years of reading our beat reporters content, she's nearly identical to the rest. They all have the same talking points and tepid criticism. If only I could pinpoint one thing that was different about her.
All of the Super Friends trot out the company line, a lot and honestly I don't expect it to be much different under Yzerman. Keep in mind he was a big part of breaking the media into line when he was a player. I could see Yzerman using them to float a false story but he hasn't always been super media available either, I don't think using them for something false was something Holland would have considered. I wonder who the inside guy is now, we always assumed it was actually Holland before, I wonder if that is Draper now...
I think where HSJ lost a lot of credibility was the Cleary stuff. I don't think her last couple seasons with him were inside scoops, she practically campaigned for him to make the roster the year he spent in Grand Rapids. That wasn't Holland talk and a lot of us that follow closely could tell on that one, it was strange. I don't dismiss what she says/writes as others have said I find it interesting when one of the players feels out whatever article she is going for and shuts her down hard in the post-game. Larks did that on a few occasions this year.
HSJ's reporting on Cleary/Bertuzzi (Todd) bordered on unprofessional.
I do think that the Detroit media is far more likely to speculate than they were 10 years ago. It's the nature of how the job has changed.
What do you think was wrong with her Bertuzzi coverage?
Where do Ehn and Erne fit in though? HSJ seems to indicate they're back. And, no provision for Svech, who's no longer waiver-exempt.
Something's gotta give....
That's why we aren't buying him out. Waiving him only saves 900k of his salary and retains the rest as a buffer against the cap floor and moves him off the main roster allowing for the future of the organization to have more time to play. Buying him out would be less of a cap hit but for longer. And whenever we needed a plug to fill a hole, he's at least capable of playing bottom 6 minutes. It's the best solution for him. Like what we did with Ericsson, this year.I dont get why we need to waive Abdelkader, it is not like we are capped anywhere in the near future...
But that's how you can know when she says these things that she's reliable.HSJ lost me because of all the team holland koolaide drinking marching in line and step. She was like a one woman holland propaganda machine. Those were dark days to be a wings fan but you would never know it from her articles.
There is a difference between taking HSJ as a professional seriously and taking her information seriously. I don’t view her as an overly talented writer, investigative reporter, or hockey mind, but she’s got connections as a team PR agent/ mouth piece.
If she’s making statements, you have to assume they are being considered internally.
Blashill is the victim of circumstances in my opinion. He's not completely at fault but at the sametime he's not really helping. I think he's a solid coach, just not a good one or one that you want developing the youth of the team.
Let's give Blashill a team full of NHL level players vs an AHL level squad. Ie. Blashill's team USA vs Finland at the WC.
Attempt 1: USA lose 2-0
Filppula plus 3 rookies
Attempt 2: USA lose 6-2
Finland had a few of NHLers, mostly non-NHL
Attempt 3: USA win 3-2 in OT
1 NHL rookie
For some strange reason, he gets outcoached by the Fins time and time again despite having the better team every time.
If anyone on thos board doesnt take her seriously than theyre not very smart. Shes the teams mouth piece that doesnt ask the hard questions which annoys some people but when she has come out with rumours or talk about whats going to happen with the team she has had the inside info.
She wouldnt just make up rumours for clicks about the wings possibly moving Blashill into the front office when they find a new coach. Thats a thing most teams would never do and pretty random unless she has some inside info
Its possible.Which has been a theme of international hockey when Finland wins every time.
Them punching above their weight in the World Championship isn't new.
They were unlucky in attempt 1 and outplayed them by system and everything else while running into a great goatending performance.
Schneider crapped the bed entirely in the second matchup where they lost the game in a five minute span if I remember right.
Also I think you might have mixed up attempt 2 and 3... But not sure.
Blashill is respected in the game for a reason by hockey people. I think it is likely time for a change, but people pretending the guy doesn't know hockey or hockey systems are out to lunch.
Blashill is respected in the game for a reason by hockey people. I think it is likely time for a change, but people pretending the guy doesn't know hockey or hockey systems are out to lunch.
FSD did show a couple clips of his team talks during last year's broadcasts, and Blash came off very unmotivational.
I don't think he is a bad coach, just not the coach this team needs. Seems more suited for an assistant role IMO.