Nac Mac Feegle
wee & free
- Jun 10, 2011
- 35,548
- 9,945
There are 31 teams in the NHL that need another elite talent on their roster.
What's your point?There are 31 teams in the NHL that need another elite talent on their roster.
What's your point?
We have the players to win, they just all have to be at their best for 16W come spring.
The PP gets going, the goaltending is hot and we are healthy, we can beat any team in a 7 game series.
His contract was insured, so they are only paying him ~$1M. If they need to they can place him on LTIR for relief, so the cap isn't a problem. Aside from that, I'd agree that the Sens need a top 6 forward to really make a push. Being mostly healthy and adding MacArthur was a big reason they were able to make some noise. I wouldn't say they were lucky, but things were falling into place for them. I think a fully healthy Karlsson, Stone and Brassard and they coulda taken the Pens down...but that's not how things go.Losing MacArthur hurt a lot the last few years and his salary continues to hold the team back from getting better by acquiring a top 6 player to replace him.
There are 31 teams in the NHL that need another elite talent on their roster.
I'd love to get Logan Couture from San Jose if at all possible.
What's your point?
This is the thing they are great individual talents but a Spezza type player would have taken them to another level. I think everyone wants more out of Stone and Hoffman. As good as 60 ish points are we will need more out of them on a more consistent level if we want to be a better team.Also Hoffman is a 1st line player, who will likely finish the season with his usual 60ish points which is 1st line production
This is the thing they are great individual talents but a Spezza type player would have taken them to another level. I think everyone wants more out of Stone and Hoffman. As good as 60 ish points are we will need more out of them on a more consistent level if we want to be a better team.
I think Stone is missing a play maker. I think Stone could be a ppg player but he can't do it on his own.Well idk what you could possibly want more of Stone, he's been arguably a top 10 player in the league this year so far. Also Hoffman is kinda hard to pair with, I doubt him playing with a better playmaker would improve his point totals. He kinda drives his own play like Evander Kane except on the power play.
Not sure how Spezza's 8 points would help us considering if he's not scoring he's beyond useless as he has little defensive awareness. Rather have an Alfie type.This is the thing they are great individual talents but a Spezza type player would have taken them to another level. I think everyone wants more out of Stone and Hoffman. As good as 60 ish points are we will need more out of them on a more consistent level if we want to be a better team.
It's not like he is going to make us worse. Would probably get someone else going at least.Not sure how Spezza's 8 points would help us considering if he's not scoring he's beyond useless as he has little defensive awareness. Rather have an Alfie type.
It's not like he is going to make us worse. Would probably get someone else going at least.
Stars won't align for this team like they did last year. Last year's run was a facade of what this team truly is.One thing's for sure — the post's title has been answered with a resounding no. We were one goal away from the Cup Finals last year, and now we're the biggest dog**** team to ever play like dog****. Neither of those are average.
Yup. Last year was an example of everything going right. This year is more in line with what this team really is, combined with a clearly still hurting Karlsson who's unable to mask some of the bigger issues we have. Regardless, not average.Stars won't align for this team like they did last year. Last year's run was a facade of what this team truly is.
Yup. Last year was an example of everything going right. This year is more in line with what this team really is, combined with a clearly still hurting Karlsson who's unable to mask some of the bigger issues we have. Regardless, not average.