KG
Registered User
- Sep 23, 2010
- 4,874
- 748
Simple question, what is the % chance, in your view, that OEL will play well enough to justify his contract?
I agree. He has lost that quick wrister. I don't know if he'll get that quick snap backIMO he never rebounds to 20 goal elite defensively OEL. He's got some serious city miles on him from years of cheap shots. I think he can still be way better than he was under Tocchet, back up to 75% to 80% prime OEL.
OEL's peak season in 2015-16 is actually the outlier and not the norm.
His sheer consistency of being able to play at a high level year in and year out is impressive and unmatched
Well the peak is almost always going to be an outlier, but I disagree that something approaching that shouldn't be expected.
My problem with Ollie really isn't the points, it's everything else. he could be a .35 to .45 per game d-man and I wouldn't care if he was the all around player he was in 2014. That's the kinda player this team needs. He's approaching outright liability on the ice, he gets dunked on all the time and usually in crushing fashion in the third period. His transition skills are diminishing as well because while he's still usually a good passer, the transition game is evolving more toward speed and carrying the puck again than nailing a killer stretch pass like he and Yandle used to do routinely to the Whitney line back in the day.
I don't know how you've watched the last three years and say something like this with a straight face. He's consistent at being inconsistent in his own zone. Bush has been the better player in his own zone the last two years, so this suggestion that somehow OEL is suffering due to a bad partner is crazy talk (his decline predates Bush and the captaincy).
I can flip that right back on you and ask how you can watch OEL and Lyubushkin as a pairing and not realise that OEL is carrying a heavy weight. I do not consider Lyubushkin better at any facet of the game. OEL constantly watches Bush knowing the next error is not far away and that he'll have to cover for it. That causes a detriment to his own game because he is then out of position trying to do the work of two defensemen. He can never even trust Bush with the puck. That's what is behind the decline and negative stats so beloved to you. But you need to look beyond the stats and look at the causes. I like Bush as a #6 defenseman who tries to get physical unlike most. But there is absolutely no way you can claim yourself with a straight face that he is top 4 defenseman material. That just does not pass the eye test.
Ask yourself - has OEL suddenly at the ages of 26-28 lost the ability to play hockey? Is that really a better explanation? Not in my book.
Ask yourself - has OEL suddenly at the ages of 26-28 lost the ability to play hockey? Is that really a better explanation? Not in my book.
He definitely seems to have lost his spark. Kid was a passion player. Really a treat to watch. Now? He’s muted. Gray. Dull.I've never questioned OEL's ability. Just his motivation and drive.
“Maybe it’s the style of play that’s holding [OEL] back. If I have one criticism of Rick Tocchet, to me he has come in with one way to coach. Good coaches are able to take a player and fit them in. Instead of figuring out how to fit a player into the system, it’s, ‘You don’t fit my style of play. You’re out.’ That’s a fault. Good coaches find a way to make good players fit.” - anonymous scout
Someone in the media said Tocchet has a....... fault!? Good thing he's anonymous otherwise he'd be crucified while being burned at the stake (cross stake?).Given some of the terrible handling of certain players we've witnessed and feedback from scouts around the league about our previous coaching administration, I think there is a good chance OEL will heavily benefit from a newly implemented play style.
I think what you'll get is what 8 out of 9 years he's produced. But the talk is always about "when will he get back to his peak performance"? That isnt realistic and he isnt going to be the same defenseman that he was 6-7 years ago. Great players constantly reinvent themselves to fit in with the needs of the team. Youngsters turn into veterans. Chychrun is now the one bombing forwards and always looking for the attack. OEL is now the experienced player trying to cover the (many) gaps in the team so that the high energy guys like Chychrun and Garland have a platform.
Someone in the media said Tocchet has a....... fault!? Good thing he's anonymous otherwise he'd be crucified while being burned at the stake (cross stake?).
I stoped reading at Bush is the better player in his own zone, but ok then....I don't know how you've watched the last three years and say something like this with a straight face. He's consistent at being inconsistent in his own zone. Bush has been the better player in his own zone the last two years, so this suggestion that somehow OEL is suffering due to a bad partner is crazy talk (his decline predates Bush and the captaincy). We're talking about a player that had the worst on ice SV% of any regular. This despite facing weaker competition than in years past and playing less overall.
Of particular note is how many high danger goals he concedes nowadays.
He was not good. You can't have your expensive totemic captain playing that way. He has been so bad now over such a span that, in combination with his contract, it will be difficult to move him even if he waives.
OEL will not play up to his value, but either do a lot of other players in the NHL. OEL is currently our second best Dman, and after him it gets pretty thin. IF we trade him we better get equal value back or I keep him. If we trade him for parts, as some have mentioned, BA should be fired on the spot.Simple question, what is the % chance, in your view, that OEL will play well enough to justify his contract?