Will MLB BOG Push For Salary Cap In Next CBA?

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
14,638
20,089
Las Vegas
I dont think it will have much support honestly.

The rich owners want to be able to spend. The poor owners wont want it because under the current system they get ~$50 million a year each from the rich teams. Revenue sharing would almost certainly be dead in a cap situation
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG and Voight

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,370
18,942
Mulberry Street
I highly doubt it. There isn't much interest for one, the smaller market owners like Butting have zero desire to build a winning team and are fine with collecting their revenue sharing checks.

It's not like parity doesn't exist. In the last decade, only the Dodgers and Astros have won it more than once.
 

DaBadGuy7

Registered User
Dec 28, 2004
2,649
1,408
Newark,NJ
I dont think it will have much support honestly.

The rich owners want to be able to spend. The poor owners wont want it because under the current system they get ~$50 million a year each from the rich teams. Revenue sharing would almost certainly be dead in a cap situation

Not completely true, Hal Steinbrenner for years has stated how much he doesn’t believe a team needs to spend over 200 million payroll to win (Rays being the best example). He might be the one of big market owners that want a cap. If you read the article, the RSN situation is another big reason why a cap might happen:



Certainly you are right about teams like Pirates not wanting a floor, but don’t how they won’t be in the owners are in agreement on the issue. I think a cap is more likely than most want to admit imo
 

eojsmada

Registered User
Oct 23, 2022
1,114
1,319
Just make the penalties stricter for going over the luxury tax. Instead of moving back a number of spots, just forfeit it altogether. A stricter penalty would be to give the pick to the team who finishes the closest behind them without having gone over the luxury cap.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad