pistolpete11
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2013
- 11,953
- 10,940
You don't want a ****** goalie performance to give Bylsma an excuse, though.
Very true. Good point.
You don't want a ****** goalie performance to give Bylsma an excuse, though.
I was talking playoffs.
Or think they can fix him, or have a better defensive scheme that will shelter him a lot more than he is here, or any number of things. Seriously, when I read things like "almost anyone would be an improvement", I wonder if people actually watch the other teams in the league. He may not be in that elite top-5 group, but he's still a hell of a goalie and if people think there wouldn't be at least 8-10 teams going after him if he hit FA, they got another thing coming.
let's say I agree with the premise that Fleury is tradeable (because in theory, I do), someone sell me on a team who would actually trade for him.
Winnepeg
let's say I agree with the premise that Fleury is tradeable (because in theory, I do), someone sell me on a team who would actually trade for him.
I think a number of teams who haven't seen the playoffs in a few years would be happy to have him. I also think that if he lands on a team that can box out and give up a limited number of high quality scoring chances they probably get pretty far with him.
Fleury has his issues with handling the puck and rebound control but we don't do any favors by giving teams an unlimited amount of attempts at the rebound either. We see plenty of goaltenders that have poor rebound control but opposing defenses won't let our forwards anywhere near the front of the net.
Hate to miss out on a chance to blame the coaches too but if he goes someplace where the coaches hold him accountable or coach him on how to handle the puck behind the net and when to leave it or play it he may turn this aspect of his game around. I have no reason to believe that he hasn't been coached extensively on this but, like I said, I hate to have a post that doesn't blame the coaches for his poor play
BTW: I'm in the camp that Bylsma needs to go. I can't overlook his resistance to playing younger, hungrier and more talented players when he has them at his disposal.
let's say I agree with the premise that Fleury is tradeable (because in theory, I do), someone sell me on a team who would actually trade for him.
So I was thinking of Edmonton. But then I have to kind of discount them, right? Because they used two draft picks on goalies this past season?
I think(?) the Flames are set. Florida is set. Ottawa is set.
Buffalo?
Washington? (huehuehue)
Islanders?
Minnesota maybe?
who else?
Winnipeg is the only team that i can think of. with MAF in net instead of Pavelec (who they'd have to buy out) they probably sneak into the playoffs last year and make a respectful run at it this year. now why would they trade for MAF when the likes of Hiller, Miller, Halák and even a resurgent Bryzgalov are available in free agency? well, MAF has a year on his contract and as long as there are enough staring jobs to go around, i doubt free agent goalies are tripping over themselves to head over there. it's certainly not a slam dunk, but it's the best i can think of right now. i think Winnipeg, at this juncture, is a fit for MAF in terms of expectation: getting the team to the playoffs for a few seasons in a row. i think the likes of Buffalo/Edmonton are still too far away from the playoff race and Minnesota has expectations that are far too high to let their success ride on MAF.
edit: missed post #60, but basically yes, for now.
Wouldn't count them out with Fletcher running things over there now, iirc there was some talk about dealing Fleury to the Wild last summer.
sell me on it, though. They (Winnipeg) were close this year. Fleury seems like the girl you wanna date and sleep with, but don't wanna marry and impregnate, right?
So if you bring him to the 'Peg, are you saying, "all we care about right now is MAKING the playoffs" ?
So I was thinking of Edmonton. But then I have to kind of discount them, right? Because they used two draft picks on goalies this past season?
I think(?) the Flames are set. Florida is set. Ottawa is set.
Buffalo?
Washington? (huehuehue)
Islanders?
Minnesota maybe?
who else?
That's my sentiment as well. We NEED him to play up to his abilities, he's capable to play at an all star level, let's hope he does.Voted no. Not so much because I don't think he will... but because I'm hoping like hell he won't.