Sedinery
Registered User
- May 24, 2021
- 2,443
- 2,292
Marc Crawford (all out offense) might have had better defensive results (remember, he didn't have a Markstrom/Demko in net) for the Canucks.He's no Barry Trotz, but his defensive results during the regular season have been far better than Green. Other than one 20th place season in ga, his 2nd worse is 12th since 2014.
Boudreau is a good coach. I wouldn't say he is a bad defensive coach, but he certainly does demand that his offensive players deliver. His post gamers are pretty blunt, and sometimes funny.I know bruce boudreaus defensive structure was bad but man I would kill to have a veteran nhl coach at this point
Marc Crawford (all out offense) might have had better defensive results (remember, he didn't have a Markstrom/Demko in net) for the Canucks.
Travis Green makes a lot of money for the media. Talks a lot during interviews, probably talks to the media guys even after the press conference. Similar to Torts except he's new, so he's trying to make an insightful impression rather than a funny impression.I don't really pay attention to sports radio but it's unfathomable that, after 7 games where the Canucks only looked dominant in one game against the pathetic Blackhawks, there isn't more discussion regarding how bad Travis Green is doing with the roster he has. Piss poor lineup decisions and deployment.
Unfortunately, if this continues, it probably buys Benning more time with a new coach.
This post is extremely flawedTravis Green makes a lot of money for the media. Talks a lot during interviews, probably talks to the media guys even after the press conference. Similar to Torts except he's new, so he's trying to make an insightful impression rather than a funny impression.
Makes sense why coaches like Belichick, Sutter, Babcock win so much. They don't tell the cameras their gameplan, opinions and ideology of hockey for other teams to counter.
Francesco Aquilini did an interview on Sportsnet. The Rogers stations purchased the NHL rights in Canada, therefore work together with owners (league) to maximize revenues. At the end of the day, painting these players as marvel characters and then a number of interviews and conferences is on purpose.This post is extremely flawed
Not for your complaints of Green, even if I don’t really disagree nor agree with it - more so with the second half of the post.
Listening to Benning Bros and media shills, you’d think the Canucks are the only team who have road trips, injuries, new players, etc. the list of excuses is endless.All this crap about “new players” and “work together”
does everyone forget so quickly that Gallant took an entire team of new players to the Stanley Cup?
he didn’t make excuses he got to work
Could not agree more. Here winning does not even matter, bar can’t be lowerListening to Benning Bros and media shills, you’d think the Canucks are the only team who have road trips, injuries, new players, etc. the list of excuses is endless.
Look at the Pittsburgh Penguins, ravaged by injuries to their best players and dealt with covid and yet they’re 3-1-2 with a +7 goal differential.
Imagine the Canucks record and excuse making if they had 4 of their top 6 forwards out. The media and fans would applaud them as heroes for just not getting blown out every night.
It sucks to see how low the bar has fallen with this franchise.