GDT: Wild at Canes - And now the left skate

[HisIceness]

Svech,Necas, Aho, Jarvis, kinda would be nice if one of you would get out of your slump

 

[tarheelhockey]

Lmao, goal wiped out because a player leaving the ice used the bench door. Should have taken one more stride and hurdled over the wall like a moron, apparently.

I’m not salty about this going against the Canes specifically. Offside reviews ****ing suck and 90% of them have absolutely nothing to do with the goal scoring sequence. It’s as bad as the late 90s crease reviews.

 

[Wolfpuck]

Horse shit. Blake had nothing to do with the play. He was already half off the ice.

 

[Joe McGrath]

This is one of those games where you have to realize a trade is needed. This team is BROKEN.

They are lackadaisical. They have no urgency, they look disinterested as if they all know their jobs are secure. Tulsky, fix that

What does that make the 26 teams with a worse record?

 

[hblueridgegal]

Not our night sports fans..

The cold weather here is killing me..hibernation season is full force..very demotivating.

 

[Brock Anton]

Rookie mistake. Probably deserves to sit for a shift or two.

Gotta get off the ice, kid.

 

[Svechhammer]

What does that make the 26 teams with a worse record?

This team has a losing record since Thanksgiving

Maybe pull your head out of your own ass sometime

 

[tarheelhockey]

Rookie mistake. Probably deserves to sit for a shift or two.

Gotta get off the ice, kid.

Build the bench doors on the other side of the blue line if they’re going to enforce offside to this level of nit-pickiness.

It wasn’t called in real time for a reason, he wasn’t part of the hockey play.

 

[User13452]

Staal KK switch lasted a whole game and 1 period lol

 

[Blueline Bomber]

Honestly, I don't mind that call. Offsides SHOULD be black and white. If we have to rely on officials determining whether or not the offsides affected the play, it'll be similar to GI in terms of "Who knows"?

 

[Stickpucker]

What this game feels like

 

[Svechhammer]

Honestly, I don't mind that call. Offsides SHOULD be black and white. If we have to rely on officials determining whether or not the offsides affected the play, it'll be similar to GI in terms of "Who knows"?

Yep, it was a good call. We have to have more urgency than we are showing

 

[Borsig]

same MO. Useless shots from the point that do nothing

 

[Joe McGrath]

Honestly, I don't mind that call. Offsides SHOULD be black and white. If we have to rely on officials determining whether or not the offsides affected the play, it'll be similar to GI in terms of "Who knows"?

Its the right call. Its asinine the way they err on letting the play go until they can review it to take a goal away.

 

[cptjeff]

Honestly, I don't mind that call. Offsides SHOULD be black and white. If we have to rely on officials determining whether or not the offsides affected the play, it'll be similar to GI in terms of "Who knows"?

I think the rule needs to specifically allow for out of the play and going through the door. That's the door configuration in every single rink and there's no real alternative to it. Just acknowledge the fact of the rink layout with a specific rule carveout and allow that goal. You don't have to make it apply to every situation where the offsides player didn't affect the play, though I wouldn't mind that either. It really shouldn't be ticky tack, it should just be a mechanism to correct the egregious stuff. The game would be better if the vast majority of offsides reviews didn't happen and the goals counted.

 

[DaveG]

Build the bench doors on the other side of the blue line if they’re going to enforce offside to this level of nit-pickiness.

It wasn’t called in real time for a reason, he wasn’t part of the hockey play.

I think this is the solution, not joking. Don't think there's anything in the rule book that says they can't.

Also if touch up offside was a thing that's a goal, but the league voted against that when that was one of the options.

 

[Stickpucker]

Zucchini always kills us.

How is that man not retired yet? Isn't he older than Burns?

 

[Blueline Bomber]

Its the right call. Its asinine the way they err on letting the play go until they can review it to take a goal away.

In that case, I imagine the linesmen didn't catch Blake getting off, so that's why offside wasn't called initially. But that's why they have coaches on the bench specifically for video review.

 

[tarheelhockey]

Honestly, I don't mind that call. Offsides SHOULD be black and white. If we have to rely on officials determining whether or not the offsides affected the play, it'll be similar to GI in terms of "Who knows"?

I mean that was how it worked for like 90 years and there were no meaningful issues. Like one time per season you might have that moment of saying “hey that looked offside, that goal shouldn’t have counted” and then you’d forget it five minutes later.

Replay actually creates controversy out of thin air.

 

[cptjeff]

Zucchini always kills us.

How is that man not retired yet? Isn't he older than Burns?

Nope, a year older than Jordan. 37 now.

 

[Joe McGrath]

I think the rule needs to specifically allow for out of the play and going through the door. That's the door configuration in every single rink and there's no real alternative to it. Just acknowledge the fact of the rink layout with a specific rule carveout and allow that goal. You don't have to make it apply to every situation where the offsides player didn't affect the play, though I wouldn't mind that either. It really shouldn't be ticky tack, it should just be a mechanism to correct the egregious stuff. The game would be better if the vast majority of offsides reviews didn't happen and the goals counted.

If his foot is off the ice, its a goal. Its no different than the plays where they slow it down and the guys toe just missed tagging up by a centimeter.

 

[cptjeff]

If his foot is off the ice, its a goal. Its no different than the plays where they slow it down and the guys toe just missed tagging up by a centimeter.

I don't really think they should be calling those plays back either. But the door is different. You have to slow down to avoid injuring yourself on a sharp steel framed corner.

 

[Joe McGrath]

I mean that was how it worked for like 90 years and there were no meaningful issues. Like one time per season you might have that moment of saying “hey that looked offside, that goal shouldn’t have counted” and then you’d forget it five minutes later.

Replay actually creates controversy out of thin air.

It is detrimental on several levels because they almost always let it go if its close. Then you rip the momentum away from the team thst scores because it was 1/4 inch offside. And you know thats the case because theres 30 or so a year called back.

 

[Anton Dubinchuk]

The Landeskog play was how many years ago? This is the way the rule works, it’s fine. It’s wonky that the bench door is in the offensive zone but that’s the way it has been and is today. I agree - it’s the exact same thing as stretching to keep a toe a centimeter onside. Get off the ice faster == tag up to get back onside faster.

 

[Stickpucker]

Hey at least the Rongos got their doors blown off today.

I hope they make some crazy moves. Slugs too...wanna see some in season action.

Tldr I'm bored do something.