BraveCanadian
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2010
- 15,333
- 4,586
High schoolers hitting the ground running was a thing at the time and you can’t teach size.
In other words, NHL GMs are often pretty dumb.
If you watch Lawton play back then, in '83 or '84, you can see the attraction....but you can also see that he didn't deserve to be drafted that high.
LaFontaine and Yzerman were very good prospects, but not super prospects, so you can also understand it in this context. LaFontaine was small, Yzerman not really a superstar scorer.
But the interesting issue, perhaps, is the high school hockey that was popular in the States at the time. These were exciting times for USA hockey, with an increasing number of top American prospects, but with not yet a good development system. Most of these guys who played high school would be playing in the USNTDP today, obviously. I think the relatively low-level of high school hockey caused problems in scouting, overrating some and underrating others. It's difficult to say how it affected individual players, but I suspect Lawton was overrated, and Leetch the opposite.
If you are talking about me, just 2 message below:There are some people using the ever famous hindsight approach with asking why a guy like Neely was over looked. While Neely looked good in Vancouver--no one thought he would become what he did. He was viewed as a crash and bang guy and that was it. It was when to Boston that he went boom
If you are talking about me, just 2 message below:
Why Was Brian Lawton A First Overall Pick?
What was the appeal? I'm not going to pretend I know much about his junior career, but it looks like he didn't even have much of one outside of high school. He was drafted ahead of Pat LaFontaine (who was a great junior player) and Steve Yzerman (who is a top 35 to 50 player all-time). He had a...forums.hfboards.com
Hard to blame the scouts considering it took time for him to be special in the nhl and it was a very strong draft (outside McBain they ended up were all strong pick), that almost scouting a pitcher in baseball timeline....
It was just a jist about size-grit being a big factor in their choice if they drafted Smith and the ironie that Neely was there, not that someone that went 8th should have been someone else number 1, that never make sense as a critic.