Teams don't draft players that in no circumstances will not commit to playing for their organization.
So i guess this statement is incorrect?
It's not an equal playing field. That's the point
Unless every team is playing in the same location and with the same coaches, there will never be an 'equal playing field'. That's life, no different then any other league. No different than the NHL. If that's the issue then fold the CHL now, because we'll never fix that. Your job as an operator is to maximize the value or program and leave no doubt, and failing that, draft US players before London does to ensure that If they do eventually come to the league and won't report, you can force London to trade for them as opposed to getting them for free. Its been a long time coming, but that strategy is starting to take hold in the OHL, more teams are drafting 'non reporting' players ahead of London. Sudbury drafted 2 top 40 rated US players in the recent OHL Draft, more then London did.
As an example, Tyler Parsons wasn't drafted in back to back years, perhaps a team should have drafted him in the 15th round, where less then 2 percent of the players
ever actually play a single regular season game? Christian Dvorak was an 8th round pick, perhaps someone should have taken him first?
Teams like Kitchener, Niagara, Kingston, Barrie, etc all do the same thing as London does, they just don't do it as well. The best player to 'fall' to a team in the first round of this year's OHL Draft was drafted by Barrie, where's the pitchforks for them?
For as long as the NCAA considered the CHL as a professional league, this issues will happen. But using the draft with a level of intelligence and being strategic with our picks can hurt other teams. You can either complain or do something about it. I get its easier to complain, that's always the easy out, but OHL teams are doing things about it, and its nice to see.
What teams like London offers to their players in terms of living location, exposure to NHL scouts, education and coaching is bar none better than most other CHL teams. Coaching and Education especially costs teams lots of money. Money teams like London, Quebec & Portland has and the rest of the CHL doesn't.
Every league operates within the same limits in regards to education packages. 7 gold packages over 4 years. That's standard, doesn't matter what your income as a team is, that's the rule. There are other creative ways to get players signed, you can structure education packages with 1 or 2 year gaurintees, but everyone is playing under the same rules.
Perhaps London/Quebec can guarantee that 2nd year vs. Sudbury who can't, but Patrick Kane isn't getting a year over year contract, he's getting one of those 7 gold packages.