Why is Crosby considered a clutch SCF performer?

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,757
86,426
Redmond, WA
And Crosby has 1 goal in all of his cup-winning campaigns. Kane has 7. Not to mention it's not just about game winning goals, it's about the timing/momentum shift that comes from any goal/assit

And Crosby has 20 career points in the cup finals to 16 for Kane.

I'm not arguing that Kane isn't a clutch playoff performer, because he certainly is. But applying that title to Kane but not Crosby is just downright nonsensical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas

blundluntman

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
3,159
3,440
I'm not arguing that Kane isn't a clutch playoff performer, because he certainly is. But applying that title to Kane but not Crosby is just downright nonsensical.
And around in circles we go. Like I have said 3x already, it's not just the number of points, it's the timing/context. Crosby is a good playoff performer, but words have meaning. I don't think of him when I think of clutch. Clutch players thrive under pressure, sometimes they don't thrive until there is pressure. I wouldn't say Crosby thrives or buckles under pressure.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: sanscosm

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,695
9,926
You're just proving my point more and more.

Your arguments are always about tearing Crosby down and coming up with any argument to downplay him, even if the argument is completely disingenuous.

Yep, tearing him down is not viewing him as top 5, and only somewhere between 6-8, and stamping out lies and exaggerations whenever they crop up.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Samhockey3

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,757
86,426
Redmond, WA
Yep, tearing him down is not viewing him as top 5, and only somewhere between 6-8, and stamping out lies and exaggerations whenever they crop up.

Whether Crosby is a "clutch SCF performer" has nothing to do with whether he's a top-5 player. It has to do with how well he performs in the cup finals relative to other players.

You're only bringing up the top-5 argument because it's easier to argue "Crosby isn't Gretzky" than actually make a legitimate argument against Crosby being a clutch SCF player.

And around in circles we go. Like I have said 3x already, it's not just the number of points, it's the timing/context. Crosby is a good playoff performer, but words have meaning. I don't think of him when I think of clutch. Clutch players thrive under pressure, sometimes they don't thrive until there is pressure. I wouldn't say Crosby thrives or buckles under pressure.

But if you're going to say that, you need to bring proof that Crosby isn't putting up "momentum influencing points" while Kane is.
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,822
15,504
Edmonton
Getting points is hard in the Cup finals when you’re playing an equally great team, facing the best checkers and the refs put away the whistles. It’s the reason why the role players usually end up being the stars of the finals.
 

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,695
9,926
Whether Crosby is a "clutch SCF performer" has nothing to do with whether he's a top-5 player. It has to do with how well he performs in the cup finals relative to other players.

You're only bringing up the top-5 argument because it's easier to argue "Crosby isn't Gretzky" than actually make a legitimate argument against Crosby being a clutch SCF player.



But if you're going to say that, you need to bring proof that Crosby isn't putting up "momentum influencing points" while Kane is.

He scored 2 goals in 19 games across 3 instances his team won the Cup. That’s literally the argument. We just watched McDavid score more goals and put up nearly as many points in one series in a losing effort than Crosby’s three combined winning efforts and you think that is some insignificant point? Who else can get away with doing so little?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: sanscosm and crab

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,757
86,426
Redmond, WA
He scored 2 goals in 19 games across 3 instances his team won the Cup. That’s literally the argument. We just watched McDavid score more goals and put up nearly as many points in one series in a losing effort than Crosby’s three combined winning efforts and you think that is some insignificant point? Who else can get away with doing so little?

And now it's all about goals as if assists don't count. If you have to completely disregard production that doesn't fit your agenda, it's pretty obvious that you're not making an honest argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,695
9,926
And now it's all about goals as if assists don't count. If you have to completely disregard production that doesn't fit your agenda, it's pretty obvious that you're not making an honest argument.

If someone mentions goals and points, what do you think is also being factored in?
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,757
86,426
Redmond, WA
If someone mentions goals and points, what do you think is also being factored in?

You literally just said "Crosby only has 2 goals in 19 games in finals he has won", which is completely erasing his assists that he has.

I don't even know why I'm bothering to respond at this point. You're making strawman arguments that basically say "Crosby isn't Gretzky therefore he's not a clutch SCF player", as if that makes any sense.
 

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,695
9,926
You literally just said "Crosby only has 2 goals in 19 games in finals he has won", which is completely erasing his assists that he has.

I don't even know why I'm bothering to respond at this point. You're making strawman arguments that basically say "Crosby isn't Gretzky therefore he's not a clutch SCF player", as if that makes any sense.

I mentioned how McDavid got nearly as many points in one losing effort (11) compared to Crosby in three winning efforts (14). You’re the only one who keeps banging on about Gretzky.
 

blundluntman

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
3,159
3,440
Whether Crosby is a "clutch SCF performer" has nothing to do with whether he's a top-5 player. It has to do with how well he performs in the cup finals relative to other players.

You're only bringing up the top-5 argument because it's easier to argue "Crosby isn't Gretzky" than actually make a legitimate argument against Crosby being a clutch SCF player.



But if you're going to say that, you need to bring proof that Crosby isn't putting up "momentum influencing points" while Kane is.
Look, I'm not gonna sit at a desk with spreadsheets open digging for excerpts from all his games; you're more than welcome to share any moments/memories you have of Sid coming in the clutch. All I can say is that I recall a fair amount of key/clutch goals/plays Kane has made in the playoffs to earn his reputation, I don't have anywhere near as many memories of Sid doing the same.

Just by searching "Kane clutch" in Youtube, I found this. Obviously this isn't just in the SCF but my OP was about the playoffs in general, which may even strengthen Crosby's argument as clutch applying the same logic:




Here's what I could find for Sid (feel free to share any others this may miss):



Kane is clutch in the playoffs because he scores game tying/winning/shifting goals and gives his team life when a series is in the balance or on the line; he's done it repeatedly to earn that reputation. Crosby has a few of those moments here and there, but his production is more evenly spread.
 

bambamcam4ever

107 and counting
Feb 16, 2012
15,044
7,131
My “analysis” is comparing him to each member of the Big Four and the incoming member who will boot Crosby down a spot on any list as he remolds it into a new Big Five. I’m sorry that Crosby never demonstrated the individual dominance expected of him or shown by his successor multiple times over. He’s still a top 6-8 player ever, in a league with over a hundred years of history. He still did well.
Gordie Howe had 8 points in 19 games in his first 4 finals. Whoopsie!
 

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,695
9,926
Gordie Howe had 8 points in 19 games in his first 4 finals. Whoopsie!

You clearly missed the part where I said all members of the Big Four had a signature performance in the SCF, i.e. Howe scoring 5 goals, factoring in on 12 of his team’s 27 goals, and scoring what turned out to be the game winner in Game 7 in the 1955 SCF. Nice try. Tell me again why Crosby scoring 2 goals total in 3 Cup wins makes him untouchable?
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,437
9,271
Regina, Saskatchewan
Howe also had the benefit of putting up multiple great SCFs in the 60s

1961 - Lead with 8 points in 6 games. Red Wings only scored 12 points so he was in on 66% of offense. Delvecchio was only other Red Wing with more than 3 points. Newspapers praise him highly.

1963 - Lead with 6 points in 5 games. Red Wings only scored 10 goals so he factored in on 60%. Newspapers praise him highly.

1964 - Lead with 8 points in 7 games. Delvecchio was second on the Wings with 5 points. Red Wings only scored 17 goals so he was in on 47% of Red Wings goals. Newspapers praise him highly.

The early mid 60s Red Wings were not great teams that basically lived on Howe and Sawchuk being the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Video Nasty

Nathaniel Skywalker

DIG IN!!! RiGHT NOW!!!
Oct 18, 2013
14,242
5,903
Would love to have seen mcdavids stats in 2009 going against a prime lidstrom, zetterberg and rafalski on his ass every shift while playing with guerin n kunitz
 

bambamcam4ever

107 and counting
Feb 16, 2012
15,044
7,131
You clearly missed the part where I said all members of the Big Four had a signature performance in the SCF, i.e. Howe scoring 5 goals, factoring in on 12 of his team’s 27 goals, and scoring what turned out to be the game winner in Game 7 in the 1955 SCF. Nice try. Tell me again why Crosby scoring 2 goals total in 3 Cup wins makes him untouchable?
Well I'm sure if Crosby could play in a 6 team league, and on the best defensive team in the league during his prime, he'd get plenty more chances to do that. Alas he had to play in a deeper NHL than the inland Canada league that Howe thrived in.
 

bambamcam4ever

107 and counting
Feb 16, 2012
15,044
7,131
Howe also had the benefit of putting up multiple great SCFs in the 60s

1961 - Lead with 8 points in 6 games. Red Wings only scored 12 points so he was in on 66% of offense. Delvecchio was only other Red Wing with more than 3 points. Newspapers praise him highly.

1963 - Lead with 6 points in 5 games. Red Wings only scored 10 goals so he factored in on 60%. Newspapers praise him highly.

1964 - Lead with 8 points in 7 games. Delvecchio was second on the Wings with 5 points. Red Wings only scored 17 goals so he was in on 47% of Red Wings goals. Newspapers praise him highly.

The early mid 60s Red Wings were not great teams that basically lived on Howe and Sawchuk being the team.
Agreed that the 60s Red Wings were not as impressive. It should be noted that those Red Wing teams:
1. Probably don't even make the playoffs in a larger league given their goal differential, instead of one where 2/3 of the teams make it.
2. Were the 4 seed each time, and benefitted from the bizarre 1/3 & 2/4 matchup system. Good chance they don't make the final facing the 1 seed, and certainly not in one of those instances when they lost to the 1 seed Toronto in the Final.

If we're going to give Howe credit for some of these, shouldn't we also note that Crosby in 08 had 6 points in a 6 game series when his team only had 10 goals total?
 

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,477
15,747
I agree that Crosby hasn't been great in the Stanley Cup finals. It's a legit strike against him. I still think he's done enough to be in contention for #5 all-time, but let's be honest about his shortcomings.

Crosby's 0.80 PPG in the SC Finals ranks him behind a lot of players who are either in contention for #5 all-time (Beliveau, Hull, McDavid, Ovechkin - the latter two with only one appearance so far) or who would rank even lower (Messier, Lafleur, Clarke, Sakic, Bossy, Trottier, Mikita, Fedorov, Kane, etc). Granted, Crosby gains some ground on many of these players when we adjust for the scoring environment, but the output is still fairly underwhelming.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,529
6,255
Visit site
Kane is clutch in the playoffs because he scores game tying/winning/shifting goals and gives his team life when a series is in the balance or on the line; he's done it repeatedly to earn that reputation. Crosby has a few of those moments here and there, but his production is more evenly spread.

And Crosby was the best of his era in positioning his team to not get to the point where a series is on the line.

Should we not call any points scored at any time in the playoffs that clearly influence the outcome of a game "clutch"?

Regardless, the OP is a strawman as most people agree that Crosby can be argued as the best playoff performer of his era and measures up well against any other of his all-time peers. Him being a notable SC Finals clutch performer is not part of the narrative. But this takes nothing away from him being the best of his era.
 

blundluntman

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
3,159
3,440
And Crosby was the best of his era in positioning his team to not get to the point where a series is on the line.

Should we not call any points scored at any time in the playoffs that clearly influence the outcome of a game "clutch"?

Regardless, the OP is a strawman as most people agree that Crosby can be argued as the best playoff performer of his era and measures up well against any other of his all-time peers. Him being a notable SC Finals clutch performer is not part of the narrative. But this takes nothing away from him being the best of his era.
The phrase "positioning his team to not get to the point where a series is on the line" is so vague I don't even know what you mean by it. Are you saying he scored key goals in such games? Because I don't recall many examples of this and couldn't find many either.

Clutch is when a player produces in a critical moment of a game. Critical meaning there is pressure during these moments due to the game being in the balance. A lot of things can influence the outcome of a game without necessarily feeling like a critical moment at the time. If you omit the pressure component when defining clutch, you can justify any player being clutch by giving butterfly effect anecdotal situations. I'm not interested in going down that kind of rabbit hole. We all know what we mean when we use the word "clutch".

I agree with the last paragraph as far as him not being a notable clutch SCF performer not taking anything away from his reputation as the best player of his era.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,529
6,255
Visit site
I agree that Crosby hasn't been great in the Stanley Cup finals. It's a legit strike against him. I still think he's done enough to be in contention for #5 all-time, but let's be honest about his shortcomings.

Crosby's 0.80 PPG in the SC Finals ranks him behind a lot of players who are either in contention for #5 all-time (Beliveau, Hull, McDavid, Ovechkin - the latter two with only one appearance so far) or who would rank even lower (Messier, Lafleur, Clarke, Sakic, Bossy, Trottier, Mikita, Fedorov, Kane, etc). Granted, Crosby gains some ground on many of these players when we adjust for the scoring environment, but the output is still fairly underwhelming.

Let's discuss each of his SCFs:

2008 - Hossa has 7 points, a 20 year old Crosby has 6 points (3 ES), both are plus 1. The Pens were up against a juggernaut Wings team that shut down everyone on the Pens, notably Malkin, who was playing injured. There wasn't much more to ask of Crosby in that series. His counterpart, Zetterberg also had 6 points (3 ES) and was a plus 1. Datsyuk also played the most against Crosby in that series.

Crosby not producing in that series was very low on the reasons why the Pens lost. Not sure even Malkin playing at his full capacity changes that result anyways. The Wings are the clear best post lockout Cup winner. Crosby still ends up as the youngest player ever to lead the playoffs in scoring.

A good comparison is a peak Lindros in '97 against another overwhelming Wings teams -3 points in 4 games or Wayne in '83 - 4 assist in 4 games. Crosby's losing SCF performance was better than those two, he got his team within a goal of going to a Game 7.


2009 - It is well understood that Crosby's point totals do not reflect the impact he had or the degree to which the Wings threw everything they had into shutting him down in the belief that their support players could outplay the Pens' support players. Zetterberg had one more ES point that series and Lidstrom notably had only 2 points after being above a PPG up to that point.

2016 - The 2016 Pens are in the mix for 2nd best Cup winner since the lockout and perhaps the 2nd best puck possession Cup winner behind the 2008 Wings. They were rolling three scoring lines lead by Crosby who has a career 3rd liner and an AHL callup who was terrible defensively on his line. They were able to spread their star players over three lines with a strategy to max out the offense of the HBK line against the other team's 3rd line and 2nd/3rd d-pairings. It was as important that Crosby's line scored as it was that the other team's # line didn't.

In the SCF, Crosby was great all around in Game 1 he set up the OT winner in Game 2, the Cup winning goal in Game 6 and the Cup clinching empty-netter. Meanwhile, the Sharks #1 underproduced.

No Pens player was above a PPG despite it being a dominant win by the Pens.

2017 - Crosby is the clear best player on the Pens and has the best SCF single game performance in Game 5 out the 25 SCF games the Pens played.


He is the best playoff performer of his era and a Cup resume befitting his status as a Top 5/10 player all-time. I don't think he loses any ground to any of his peers like Beliveau and Hull if one chooses to only look as SCFs, which is unfair given the different playoff formats anyways.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $205.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 7
    Staked: $52,190.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $185.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $155.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • NHL GRAND SALAMI - 11/18 - 6 GAMES
    NHL GRAND SALAMI - 11/18 - 6 GAMES
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $1,692.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad