Why did LAK let Matt Roy walk?

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
32,474
22,124
Righthanded Defensemen are like the hardest thing in the world to find in today's NHL. With analytics and heavy emphasis on possession, having defensemen that play their natural hand has been one of the biggest explosions in terms of the last 20 years or so. How LA went from having a loaded stable of RHD to their situation now is a bit of a head scratcher. With Roy in particular who is in his Defensemen prime (29) and not overly expensive, especially given they had already traded Faber.. what was going on there? Was he unhappy? Did they just not realize the value he brings? I feel like he's been a really 'unsung' hero of Washington's crazy turnaround this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neil Racki
Kings had a stacked right side to the point where I think Sean Durzi was playing on the left for a bit if I recall correctly. With the salary cap it's difficult to keep everybody and they had Brandt Clarke (on a helpful ELC) on the verge of cracking the NHL lineup.

I miss CapFriendly, but according to CapWages the Kings would be just under the cap if Drew Doughty was healthy. So I'm not sure LA had the space to fit in Roy (5.75 mil) without a corresponding move or two.
 
It's because he isn't worth $5.75M until he's 35 years old. So far, he has 10 points and the 6th-worst on-ice GF% and SAT% among Caps defenders. In comparison, Jordan Spence (who probably would've been the loser if Roy had been re-signed) has 13 points, the best on-ice GF% and the 3rd-best SAT% among Kings defenders, and he costs only $1.5M. Those are better stats for nearly a quarter of the cost. Their roles aren't identical, but I'd say that one is bringing more value than the other.

That said, letting Roy walk into unrestricted free agency was dumb. LA should've gotten something for him at the trade deadline. A team probably would've paid quite a bit, but Blake was afraid of trading him and then losing in the 1st round again, so he kept him and then lost in the 1st round again, instead.
 
Last edited:
Making room for Spence and Clarke in the lineup

This

Because Rob Blake and Luc Robitaille are incompetent morons

But mostly this



They went from Doughty-Faber-Roy-Walker-Clarke-Spence-Durzi-Grans and I'm probably forgetting one to Doughty-Clarke-Spence in like two years flat with nothing to show for it but Kevin Fialiability and assets related to departures of Petersen and PLD
 
It's because he isn't worth $5.75M until he's 35 years old. So far, he has 10 points and the 6th-worst on-ice GF% and SAT% among Caps defenders. In comparison, Jordan Spence (who probably would've been the loser if Roy had been re-signed) has 13 points, the best on-ice GF% and the 3rd-best SAT% among Kings defenders, and he costs only $1.5M. Those are better stats for nearly a quarter of the cost. Their roles aren't identical, but I'd say that one is bringing more value than the other.

That said, letting Roy walk into unrestricted free agency was dumb. LA should've gotten something for him at the trade deadline. A team probably would've paid quite a bit, but Blake was afraid of trading him and then losing in the 1st round again, so he kept him and then lost in the 1st round again, instead.
"Not identical" is an understatement. Matt Roy plays shutdown minutes against top lines on a team that has three high-end offensive guys in Carlson, Chychrun, and Sandin, while Spence gets sheltered minutes because Anderson and Gavrikov take the tough ones, plus second unit PP time. Spence turns a 55.6 OZ start% into 63.04 GF%, Roy turns a 28.4 OZ start% into a 53.7 GF%. The fact that Spence only has 3 more points in 6 more games really isn't that impressive.

I'm not trying to denigrate Spence here, just saying you were leaving out some really important context for that comparison.
 
Both Clarke and Spence have shown the capability to play in the NHL is the biggest reason. The other issue is the pairing of Roy/Gavrikov just decreased in quality.

They reportedly tried to re-sign him, but the Kings have needed to get younger for quite some time. Ideally, they would have traded him in the offseason, but no team would reasonably trade valuable assets to retain the rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghetty Green
Said it before, the Kings had the ~2017'ish Ducks problem of having a bunch of young D and having to make some choices. You aren't always going to make the right ones with dmen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: olli
He wasn’t as good as people thought he was either. Regularly, and I mean regularly he had a huge problem with defending near the crease. Could not block the lane and had a massive problem covering his man near the goalie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reaper45
Its ruled out a team trades one of their best defenders (Roy) at the trade deadline while actually going into the playoffs. I never understood that argument. When do you see that, never.

For $6M it was better to let him go and both Spence and Clarke are doing ok.

Odd topic.
 
It's because he isn't worth $5.75M until he's 35 years old. So far, he has 10 points and the 6th-worst on-ice GF% and SAT% among Caps defenders. In comparison, Jordan Spence (who probably would've been the loser if Roy had been re-signed) has 13 points, the best on-ice GF% and the 3rd-best SAT% among Kings defenders, and he costs only $1.5M. Those are better stats for nearly a quarter of the cost. Their roles aren't identical, but I'd say that one is bringing more value than the other.

That said, letting Roy walk into unrestricted free agency was dumb. LA should've gotten something for him at the trade deadline. A team probably would've paid quite a bit, but Blake was afraid of trading him and then losing in the 1st round again, so he kept him and then lost in the 1st round again, instead.
6th-worst defenseman of the team sounds pretty elite to me if you're playing in a Conference-leading team
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad